The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

US Department of Justice Scrutinises Markit’s CDS Activities

Regulatory scrutiny of the derivatives market is at an all time high following the financial crisis and the desire of the regulatory community to be seen to be taking the issues raised by the crisis in hand. Most recently up for investigation is data provider Markit Group, which is currently under investigation by the US Department of Justice’s (DoJ) Antitrust Division.

Although there is some degree of confusion about exactly what the DoJ is investigating, it is largely assumed that the London-based derivatives data specialist is being scrutinised regarding its ownership structure and pricing practices. There has also been speculation by some that the vendor’s pricing practices for its RED codes are also under the regulator’s gaze, but this has not been confirmed. For now, it seems that the US investigator is seeking to determine whether the bank owners of Markit, which include JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Royal Bank of Scotland, had unfair access to price information.

The data provider is a big player in the credit derivatives market in terms of providing valuations and its core pricing model is based on contributions from its client banks. The opaque nature of these markets has been a target for many regulators over recent months, see for example the proposals to move all credit default swaps (CDS) onto regulated trading platforms. The DoJ investigation is likely another attempt by regulators to increase its understanding of and transparency around the space.

The anonymity of the market is, however, a dangerous area to target with regards to full transparency. By forcing full disclosure of pricing by specific contributors, the regulator would effectively drive the business out of the market.

The result of the investigation is understandably being closely monitored by all in the valuations space and the secrecy of the procedures have added momentum to the Chinese whispers going across the industry. The concern of many of those in the space is that Markit may become a victim of the regulatory community’s derivatives witch hunt, thus setting a dangerous precedent for the future.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Evolution of data management for the buy-side 2021

The buy-side faced a barrage of regulation in 2020 and is now under pressure to make post-Brexit adjustments and complete LIBOR transition by the end of 2021. To ensure compliance and ease the burden of in-house data management, many firms turned to outsourcing and managed services. But there is more to come, as buy-side firms...

BLOG

FundGuard Plans Product Development to Drive Transparency in Fund Administration

New York-based FundGuard, a pioneer of AI in investment management and asset services, has completed a $12 million Series A funding round. The company will use the funding for product development to meet increased regulatory demands for transparency and resilience in the fund administration segment. The company works with several of the world’s largest fund...

EVENT

Data Management Summit USA Virtual

Now in its 11th year, the Data Management Summit USA Virtual explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions Europe 2010

The European corporate actions market could be the stage of some pretty heavy duty discussions regarding standards going forward, particularly with regards to the adoption of both XBRL tagging and ISO 20022 messaging. The region’s issuer community, for one, is not going to be easy to convince of the benefits of XBRL tags, given the...