The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

UK FSA’s Huertas Talks up Practical Implications of Living Wills Legislation, Including Counterparty Data Requirements

Judging by the number of references that have been made to living wills legislation during reference data related events and conferences recently, the market is already well aware of the data challenge awaiting it. However, for those that may have been asleep for the last few months, Thomas Huertas, director of the banking sector for the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) and vice chairman of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), has been doing his level best to raise awareness of these challenges and how the industry can tackle them.

Last month, for example, Huertas gave a speech about how the concept can be implemented to the Wharton School of Management in Philadelphia. The perceived benefits and challenges of living wills has also been highlighted by other members regulatory community frequently over the last six months, see Fed board governor Daniel Tarullo’s speeches on the subject, for just one example. Huertas, for his part, has displayed ample consideration of the data management challenge that will stem from mandatory “recovery and resolution plans”, but feels they are important in order for the assessment of the “social risk posed by the failure of a large, systemically important bank” on society as a whole.

While recovery plans will have a dramatic impact on capital planning and liquidity, both recovery and resolution planning will likely require significant investment in data architecture. The capital and liquidity planning required for mandatory resolution plans will entail firms keeping a tight rein on where its liquidity is located and therefore the organisation of counterparty and instrument data will become paramount in a business sense. Unlike boom times, financial institutions now cannot afford to throw away opportunities due to bad data and may be severely penalised for such failures, but recovery plans take this one stage further: failure of the firm itself may be a result.

At last resort, banks will need to know to which counterparties they can turn in order to raise capital or liquidity in a crisis and this necessarily involves having a complete picture of exposures to those entities. This data will need to be readily at hand in order to take action swiftly and effectively, hence an investment in a data infrastructure to store this vital information is needed to replace the heavily siloed infrastructures that are currently endemic across the industry.

Resolution plans, on the other hand, are for regulators to implement but require banks to establish sufficiently detailed wills for the purposes of winding down. The regulators will be checking therefore that banks could in fact generate the details of such information, including granular detail such as counterparty exposures on a position level, on short notice. Really short notice: “The longest period of time that the authorities are likely to have to make a decision is the roughly 36 to 48 hours between the close of business on a Friday in Europe and North America and the opening of markets in Asia when it is still Sunday evening in North America.”

Huertas elaborated on the type of information required for resolution: “This includes the legal vehicle structure of the banking group, a mapping of its principal businesses against that legal vehicle structure and identification of financial and operational dependencies among various elements of the group. It also includes information concerning the bank’s membership in payments, clearing and settlement infrastructures, information concerning the segregation of client assets and the procedures by which such segregated client assets could be transferred to third parties. Finally, the authorities will need information concerning the bank’s deposit base: what is insured and what is not, as well as what is the maturity structure, terms and conditions of the deposits.”

The regulatory community has warned that it will run ‘fire drills’ to check that firms are able to produce this data in a timely fashion, which given the current state of most data architectures in these large firms, wouldn’t be a pretty process if they tried it any time soon.

For those of you still in the dark about the basics, Huertas elaborated on what a recovery plan actually is: “Under a recovery plan the bank is forced to think through in advance what it would do if the bank were to fall under extreme stress, much the way the bank is forced to think through what it would do to assure business continuity in the event of an extreme disruption to its physical infrastructure, such as might result from fire, flooding, earthquake, pandemic or terrorist attack.”

He also elaborated on the details of a resolution plan: “Under a resolution plan, the bank is asked to plan for how it would provide to the authorities in a timely manner the information the authorities would require in order to make a choice among the resolution methods available to resolve the bank, should resolution be required. To some extent this planning would enable the authorities in advance to focus their contingency planning on methods that are likely to be feasible, as well as to identify obstacles to resolution that might potentially be removed in advance, either by the firm itself or by the authorities.”

Huertas’ full speech is available to download on the FSA website here.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: A new way of collaborating with data

Digital transformation in the financial services sector has raised many questions around data, including the cost and volume of reference data required by each financial institution. Firms want to pick and choose the reference data they need to fulfil their requirements. Emerging solutions with the potential to decrease the cost of data and increase flexibility...

BLOG

Derivatives Service Bureau Sets Timeline for Consultation on OTC ISIN and CFI Services in 2022

The Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB) has published the timeline for its 2021 industry consultation on 2022 OTC ISIN and CFI service provision. Core themes focus on providing updates for service enhancements sought last year, as well as risk analysis relating to the DSB’s cybersecurity and cloud resilience. The OTC ISIN and CFI consultation will operate...

EVENT

Data Management Summit USA Virtual

Now in its 11th year, the Data Management Summit USA Virtual explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Seventh Edition

Sourcing entity data and ensuring efficient and effective entity data management is a challenge for many financial institutions as volumes of data rise, more regulations require entity data in reporting, and the fight again financial crime is escalated by bad actors using increasingly sophisticated techniques to attack processes and systems. That said, based on best...