The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

The Latest PRIIPs RTS

By Ronan Brennan, chief technology officer, Silverfinch

The European Commission has published what is hopefully the final iteration of the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS), and with the European Parliament announcing that it has no objection to the new RTS, the industry has finally arrived at a point that seemed very distant at one stage.

There are four key areas of change in the RTS that the industry needs to be aware of:

The treatment of Multi-Option-PRIIPs (MOPs) and derogation for UCITS

Where a MOP has one or more underlying investments that are UCITS, or UCITS equivalents that today produce UCITS Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the generic PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) used for the MOP is allowed to mix both PRIIPs Summary Risk Indicator (SRI) and UCITS Synthetic Risk and Reward Indicator (SRRI) risk values in the range of risks presented as if they were from a single scale. This will, however, make a UCITS look comparatively more risky than an equivalent non-UCITs product of similar risk. Additionally, where a MOP only has UCITS as underlying investments (a ‘pure’ UCITS MOP) then the costs presented in the generic PRIIPs KID can be presented as per costs in the UCITS KIID. A further derogation has been allowed for UCITS with respect to transaction costs, with the RTS allowing UCITS to follow the ‘new PRIIPs’ methodology. This is outlined in point 21 Annex VI.

Finally, within the context of a MOP, the PRIIP provider can use the actual UCITS KIID as the Special Information Document (SID) for the underlying investment option. While the inconsistencies that arise from some of these changes are frustrating, they were nonetheless considered a welcome measure by many in the industry as it simplifies the process for UCITS managers during the grandfathering period.

Performance scenarios

The situation with the performance scenarios is quite straight forward. Where once we had three to five scenarios, we now have four mandatory scenarios and one conditional scenario, the ‘death’ one. In essence, the optional ‘significantly unfavourable’ scenario has been replaced with a new mandatory ‘stress scenario’. The changes mooted to the value at risk-based formula in the interim RTS, which were issued in late 2016, where the mean performance value had been effectively set to zero, have been rolled back to the original formula as outlined in the original RTS. So, where the original RTS was criticised as being too bullish, and the interim one criticised as being too bearish, this one is seen to be a little too bullish.

The main concerns expressed by the industry relate to possible moral hazard. This is introduced by representation of future performance, which when combined with potentially nonsensical transaction cost information that can appear to show that a fund generates a return by the simple act of trading or applying an Anti-Dilution Levy, could lead to an investor potentially bearing more risk than is understood to be the case.

Comprehension alerts

An update to article one of the RTS has tidied up the potential for a misalignment of comprehension alerts and complex products. The RTS introduces a standardised approach across PRIIPs, Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) and the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD, think MiFID II for the insurance industry). The main problem here is that the IDD and MiFID II have different implementation dates, and so the available RTS/Q&A documentation is at a very different stage of maturity – with IDD being less mature.

Biometric risk premiums and the disclosure of insurance costs

The Commission felt that the way insurance costs were being disclosed was likely to lead to confusion for the investor and would be counterproductive. The changes reflect a simplification of the disclosure to allow these costs to be rolled up under the ongoing costs.

Praise is due to the Commission for succeeding in getting the RTS accepted after its rejection last year delayed the implementation of PRIIIPs by a year. In a meeting with the Commission recently, I was very encouraged by its desire to engage with the industry. While the Commission knew it had three months to consult with Parliament, it took the view that regulated companies would be aided by a swift resolution – an important sign that the industry is being listened to.

So where does this leave the various players in the industry? As many have come to realise, this is not a simple three-page document, and nine months is not a lot of time to roll out the PRIIPs programme. However, thanks to the revised RTS, we believe there is enough information in the public domain to facilitate critical data exchange between investment managers and PRIIPs providers and support timely and efficient production of documents.

Silverfinch is a provider of regulatory data exchange solutions

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Data Standards – progress and case studies

Global data standards and identifiers are essential to business growth, market stability and cost reduction – but they can be challenging to implement, while a lack of consistency across jurisdictions has presented obstacles to global take-up. However, with regulators starting to sit up and take note, the issue of data standards is coming increasingly to...

BLOG

How to Combine Data Science and Analytics to Drive Business Value Out of Data

Data science and analytics are critical to driving value out of data, delivering business insight at speed, and gaining competitive advantage. With so much at stake, financial institutions need a strategy that puts data scientists in business units, identifies appropriate technologies and tools, and scales solutions beyond proofs of concept. This week’s A-Team Group webinar...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

The TradingTech Summit in London brings together European senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution and trading architecture to discuss how firms can use high performance technologies to optimise trading in the new regulatory environment.

GUIDE

RegTech Suppliers Guide 2020/2021

Welcome to the second edition of A-Team Group’s RegTech Suppliers Guide, an essential aid for financial institutions sourcing innovative solutions to improve their regulatory response, and a showcase for encumbent and new RegTech vendors with offerings designed to match market demand. Available free of charge and based on an industry-wide survey, the guide provides a...