About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Smart Contracts Show Potential; Progress Limited So Far

Subscribe to our newsletter

Experts on the deployment of blockchain technology to handle smart contracts, which facilitate trust between parties in a transaction, are disagreeing about how much blockchain is being applied to smart contracts so far.

The battle was joined in a panel discussion at the Blockchain for Wall Street conference hosted by the Wall Street Blockchain Alliance on November 29. According to Preston Byrne, chief operating officer and general counsel at Monax Industries, the maker of the Eris blockchain platform, “nothing” is in production currently for smart contracts, although he sees prototypes in the works that could be in production by the end of 2017.

IBM, the Swiss non-profit Ethereum Foundation, and New York and London based technology company R3 have emerged as the leading blockchain platforms for the financial services industry. Byrne gave an edge to Ethereum’s Solidity language for smart contracts processing. “Our bets are on [Solidity], because we see the most enthusiasm about it,” he said. “It’s organically built from scratch.”

The Hyperledger open source project for blockchain technology is being applied to smart contracts, however, according to Bart Cant, blockchain community leader at Capgemini Financial Services. “We see new initiatives like Hyperledger, Corda [R3’s platform] and other platforms jumping into the smart contract space,” he said. “It’s an evolution we’re going to see and continue to see. I’m not sure who the winner is going to be, but we’re looking at all pieces of it. Each brings specific aspects strengths to the environment. We will see that evolve over time.”

Use of blockchain for smart contracts by investment banking firms, particularly for trading and settlement of syndicated loans, could bring several benefits, according to a Capgemini study. Settlement of syndicated loan transactions could be reduced from 20 days down to 6 to 10 days; demand could be increased by 5 to 6%, and income from such transactions could increase by anywhere from $2 billion to $7 billion annually, according to the study.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The Buy-side Trading Desk of the Future

The buy-side trading desk is facing a structural reckoning. Decades of siloed systems for equities, FX and fixed income have created what COOs increasingly describe as a “silo tax” – duplicated headcount, fragmented data, and operational overhead that is harder to justify now that the underlying workflows have, in functional terms, converged. Thirty years of...

BLOG

What the 2026 TradingTech Insight Awards USA Reveal About the Direction of the Trading Stack

The trading stack that North American capital markets ran on five years ago is not the one they run on now. Front-office systems that once stood alone are being asked to talk to one another. Data that was once simply delivered is now expected to drive decisions. And the question vendors hear from buy-side and...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...