The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

SFTR Reporting Goes Live – But Is the Industry Ready?

Share article

The first deadline for new transaction reporting under the UE’s SFTR went live on July 13, and while the first phase seems to have come off relatively smoothly, there are still some concerns around the readiness of the financial services industry when it comes to the reporting process.

“Whilst [this] marks the first deadline for new transaction reporting requirements under SFTR, the truth is that many sell-side firms remain unprepared,” warns Neil Vernon, Chief Technology Officer at Gresham Technologies. “Banks will be reporting, but the bottom line is: if you can’t report accurately and on time, should you be trading? What value does reporting under the new SFTR regulation have if you can’t be confident in the quality of your data?”

Gresham points out that sell-side firms could also be about to see a steep incline in data errors when it comes to transaction reporting on July 13. “To put this into context, 36 months on from MiFIDII and we’re still flagging around 300,000 problems a day for transactions under the regulation, and that’s just at one organisation. By comparison, for SFTR reports being produced now we’re looking at around 1.5 million errors a day,” he tells RegTech Insight. “Although it is too early to determine its wider impact on trading activity, SFTR will separate the wheat from the chaff: who has invested in the right reconciliation technology to establish data quality controls, and who remains bogged down in the murky waters of manual processing and legacy tech.”

But others are more optimistic. “We’ve been impressed with the level of focus and resources the sell-side industry has allocated towards their preparations for the SFTR go-live,” notes Val Wotton, Managing Director of Product Development and Strategy, Repository and Derivatives Services at DTCC. “While some issues remain in areas such as the reporting of lifecycle events and the reconciliation process, these will only be resolved once the industry has undergone practical implementation and the buy-side goes live in October. As a result, the go-live date is not the end of preparation for the sell-side community, but rather the beginning of the next phase in SFTR implementation. We look forward to continuing our close collaboration with market participants as the regulation takes effect.”

The recent deadlines are also a warning shot for the buy-side, who now have three months before that come within scope of the regulation themselves – and should be taking this time to learn as much as possible from the sell-side example.

“While the sell-side have undertaken significant work and are prepared for the first two phases of the implementation, there are still some outstanding issues which can only be resolved after SFTR takes effect,” explains Wotton. “This creates an ambitious deadline for sell-side firms to assist those buy-side firms who have opted for the delegated reporting model, as several outstanding issues within this model remain including the reporting of collateral reuse. As a result, we urge all buy-side firms to act now, finalise their reporting plans and begin testing in order to avoid disruption ahead of the October deadline.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best Practices for Integrated Regulatory Reporting Across Multiple Jurisdictions

The regulatory reporting obligations of financial institutions have mushroomed in scale over the past decade, leaving firms facing a raft of different requirements to provide increasingly granular metrics on their transaction, valuation and collateral data to a number of regulatory authorities. While many of these reports draw from the same core data set, the nuanced differences...

BLOG

SteelEye Seeks to Automate Compliance with Auto-Trade Reconstruction Technology

Compliance technology and data analytics firm SteelEye made a splash last week with the launch of its new Auto-Trade Reconstruction technology, which reduces the time it takes for a firm to reconstruct a trade from days to seconds. Under MiFID II, MAR, Dodd-Frank and other global regulations, authorised firms can be asked by the regulator at...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 10th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London explores how financial institutions are shifting from defensive to offensive data management strategies, to improve operational efficiency and revenue enhancing opportunities. We’ll be putting the business lens on data and deep diving into the data management capabilities needed to deliver on business outcomes.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2020/2021 – Eighth Edition

This eighth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook is a ‘must-have’ for capital markets participants during this period of unprecedented change. Available free of charge, it profiles every regulation that impacts capital markets data management practices giving you: A detailed overview of each regulation with key dates, data and data management implications, links to...