About a-team Marketing Services
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

SCV Reforms will Require Lots of New Counterparty Data Linkages and 25 New Data Fields, Says JWG’s Di Giammarino

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) incoming Single Customer View (SCV) reforms, which are part of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), will require financial institutions to introduce a raft of new data linkages in order to consolidate customer data into the required reporting format, said PJ Di Giammarino, CEO of JWG at last night’s FS Club. The reforms will also mean firms will need to add 25 new data fields to be able to provide an aggregate view of all customer deposits across businesses and products.

Following a protracted consultation period last year, the FSA has given firms a year in which to adapt their systems in order to be able to provide a single view of their customer data: the deadline for compliance is the fourth quarter of this year. This, combined with the “regulatory tsunami” facing the industry this year, should help data management teams to secure some funding in order to keep the regulators off the backs of firms’ boards.

The single view is required for firms to be enabled to achieve a seven day payout target for customer compensation, should the worst happen, according to the FSA. In order to ensure that firms are capable of doing this, the regulator is therefore introducing reporting procedures to test firms’ SCV capabilities. “These reports will be checked for data quality but there is currently no standard set against which to benchmark,” explained Di Giammarino.

According to the estimates published by the FSA and drawn up by consulting firm Ernst & Young last year, the total cost to a large bank of the data cleansing process in order to be able to produce these reports will be between £191 and £243 million. “These are scary numbers as the average large bank will have to shell out a quarter of a million on data scrubbing alone,” said Di Giammarino.

The FSA will also begin checking early to see that banks have begun the implementation process: the first deadline for reporting of firms’ project plans is 31 July this year.

Furthermore, the rest of Europe is also poised to follow suit, as these customer protections are all part of the G20 reform plan (point 60, according to Di Giammarino), as well as many other countries including Australia, which has gone one step further than the FSA in its prescriptive approach. The lack of a common plan and data standards may mean even more cost to those banks operating across jurisdictions (much the same as liquidity reporting standards).

Panellists including Rekha Modi Gomes, compliance director at EMEA Consumer for Citi and Peter Tyler director of Retail at the British Bankers’ Association (BBA) agreed that there was little business compulsion to produce this SCV apart from keeping the regulator happy. The authorised entity view that is required by the FSA is not applicable to the way banks do business and would not likely prove much benefit in a commercial sense, said Modi Gomes.

The most challenging aspect of the reform will be to meet the strict deadlines that have been set by the FSA, given that clarity on the matter has come fairly late into the process, agreed Modi Gomes and Tyler. Moreover, the data required to produce the FSA’s reports is held in many different systems, in different formats and some will even need to be disaggregated before it can be used, they said.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: FRTB: What still needs to be done before the global deadline of January 2023?

While implementation of Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) regulation has been delayed twice for reasons first of complexity and second of the coronavirus pandemic, the final deadline of January 1, 2023 is less than a year away. For banks in scope of the regulation, the time to put necessary risk infrastructure and data...

BLOG

ESMA Proposes Amendments to MiFIR Transparency Requirements

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has proposed targeted amendments to some of its Regulatory Technical Standards, essentially RTS 1 and RTS 2, which specify Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) transparency requirements for equity and non-equity. The amendments aim to clarify, improve and simplify the transparency regime for equity and non-equity instruments. The...

EVENT

FRTB Briefing Virtual (Redirected)

The FRTB Briefing Virtual will examine key focus areas and priorities for banks in 2020 and offer guidance, advice and expertise for tackling the challenges and pain points around implementing the FRTB regulation.

GUIDE

ESG Data Handbook 2022

The ESG landscape is changing faster than anyone could have imagined even five years ago. With tens of trillions of dollars expected to have been committed to sustainable assets by the end of the decade, it’s never been more important for financial institutions of all sizes to stay abreast of changes in the ESG data...