The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Privacy Concerns Raised About Office of Financial Research, But Reforms Likely to Pass Without Significant Amendment

Share article

This month’s regulatory debate on the subject of the Office of Financial Research proposals, which are contained in Title I of the current US financial reform bill, included discussion of the potential threat to privacy that the data centre poses to the US market overall. Democrat senator Susan Garrett called the Office of Financial Research “Big Brother on steroids” and Republican senator Jeb Hensarling made a motion to strike the proposals from the reform bill. However, Democrat senators Barney Frank and Carolyn Maloney both supported the establishment of the utility and the amendment to strike the proposals failed.

Hensarling is not the first senator to raise privacy concerns about the Office of Financial Research; Republican senator Richard Shelby indicated his fear about misappropriation of the data back in May. Shelby has also previously noted the potentially high cost of the establishment of such a utility, which he called a “half billion dollar per year federal bureaucracy”. However, the recent discussions do not seem to have included the cost equation.

Garrett indicated that she believes the Office of Financial Research data should be limited to that involved in “systemic risk issues” rather than acting as an all-encompassing instrument and entity data utility. She also highlighted the extension of the new body’s powers to collect financial data with what she felt was limited by “very few controls”. Hensarling added: “I don’t see any congressional oversight of Office of Financial Research.”

Democrat senator Max Bachus also spoke out against the utility.

However, the majority did not share these concerns, as the vote to strike the reforms related to the Office of Financial Research failed by 7-12. Maloney, for example, supported the introduction of the utility in order to be able to accurately track risk exposure across the financial services industry, pointing to AIG as an example of one instance where more data would have been handy.

There is due to be a vote today on whether to limit the reforms to systemic risk related data and Frank might be forced to accept these amendments. This will likely affect the initial scope of the project and mean the utility is focused on tracking data from systemically important financial institutions, rather than all firms in the market. However, regardless of restricted scope, it will still impact the standardisation agenda for instrument and entity identification.

Moreover, given that these reforms have now been passed, albeit possibly slightly amended, and it looks very much like the whole bill will soon be approved, it will be interesting to see the progress made towards discussing how the utility will work in practice.

The original bill (with section 151 onwards being focused on the Office of Financial Research) is available to download here.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How far should counterparty screening go? Balancing the ideal and the realistic

Counterparty screening is a regulatory requirement, but do you know enough about your clients’ clients, and beyond? How can you source this information and how does it benefit your business? How far do you need to dig into entity ownership structures? This webinar discusses these challenges and how they relate to your organisation, whether you’re...

BLOG

Mphasis Partners with iMeta on AI-Driven KYC Model

Cloud and cognitive specialist Mphasis has launched a brand new strategic partnership with the UK’s iMeta Technologies, a provider of onboarding, client lifecycle and master data management software and services, to deliver a next generation onboarding model for the UK and Europe that aims to disrupt the traditional KYC market through the use of AI....

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

The TradingTech Summit in London brings together European senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution and trading architecture to discuss how firms can use high performance technologies to optimise trading in the new regulatory environment.

GUIDE

The Data Management Implications of Solvency II

This special report accompanies a webinar we held on the popular topic of The Data Management Implications of Solvency II, discussing the data implications for asset managers and their custodians and asset servicers. You can register here to get immediate access to the Special Report.