The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

OFR’s Ref Data Could be a Cyber Attack Target, Warns Sans Institute’s Paller

Subscribe to our newsletter

As well as coming under attack for its central theory of collecting data for systemic risk analysis during a government organised roundtable last week (see more on which here), the US Office of Financial Research (OFR) also came under fire for the potential information security threat it could pose. Alan Paller, founder and research director of the global security focused Sans Institute, indicated that federal agencies currently prove to be easy targets for cyber attacks and unless much more rigorous IT security measures are taken for the OFR, it will end up putting the data it collects at risk.

“As long as security remains so lax inside government, there is great risk that any data gathered by government would be easy prey for financial criminals and nation states bent on cyber mischief,” said Paller. “This concern applies particularly to small agencies that may lack the scale to implement first class cyber security protections. For example, if the OFR moves data from well protected financial sites to less well protected government or contractor sites, they will put that data at risk.”

Given that Swift and the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) have been backed by the industry to take on the mantle of establishing and maintaining the new legal entity identification (LEI) standards that are required by the OFR, both will no doubt refute that their data repositories could pose such a threat. After all, Swift sells itself on the basis of the security and resilience of its financial messaging network and the DTCC is already a data repository and clearer trusted by the government authorities.

However, it is by no means a done deal that these two will act as the technology and standards partners for the whole of the OFR, this mandate only covers the LEI. What of the other systemic risk monitoring data items listed by Berner and Liechty last week? Surely sensitive transaction reporting and internal risk data are potentially at threat in Paller’s eyes?

To guard against the dangers of a cyber attack, Paller therefore listed a number of suggested defences that should be introduced against these dark forces:

  • Continuous (daily) monitoring of the 20 key controls in the Consensus Audit Guidelines (CAG) and the exclusive use of tools that strictly adhere to the automation and interoperability requirements of the security configuration automation protocols developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Agency (NSA).
  • Implacable adherence to operating system and software configurations defined in the Universal Gold Master configurations approved by the Department of Defence’s Joint Consensus Working Group.
  • Rigorous multi-factor identity validation of every user without exceptions.
  • A team of at least eight “hunters and tool builders” who use constantly updated scripts to monitor OFR system logs and network information continuously to find evidence of penetrations and then reverse engineer, and eliminate malicious programmes that make it through the perimeter.
  • Software code analysis and penetration testing for all software that accesses sensitive information and any that allows access to the systems, such as websites.
  • Auditors who verify these defences are in place and substantial consequences for auditors if they miss well known problems.

If the risk to the nation’s financial system is great enough, determine whether the collected data should be treated as, and protected as classified data.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Recorded Webinar: Sanctions – The new pre-trade challenge for the buy-side

Sanctions screening at the security level is a relatively recent requirement for the buy-side. It dives deeper than traditional KYC and AML screening and is immensely challenging as firms must monitor frequently changing sanctions lists, source up-to-date sanctions data and beneficial ownership data, and integrate these to screen growing lists of potentially sanctioned securities. As...


Brexit One Year On: How has the Trading Infrastructure Landscape Changed?

A year on from the UK’s exit from the EU, financial markets across UK and Europe have remained relatively healthy, and trading has continued across all asset classes without any major disruptions. Back in April last year, we reported on how firms were navigating the post-Brexit trading landscape, focusing on the preparations that trading venues...


RegTech Summit Virtual (Redirected)

The highly successful RegTech Summit Virtual was held in November 2020 and explored how business and operating models are adapting post COVID and how RegTech can provide agile and enhanced compliance for managing an evolving risk and compliance landscape. The event featured daily live keynotes, panel discussions, presentations, fireside chats and Q&A sessions with content available on demand over five days.


Trading Regulations Handbook 2021

In these unprecedented times, a carefully crafted trading infrastructure is crucial for capital markets participants. Yet, the impact of trading regulations on infrastructure can be difficult to manage. The Trading Regulations Handbook 2021 can help. It provides all the essentials you need to know about regulations impacting trading operations, data and technology. A-Team Group’s Trading...