About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

No-Deal Brexit Could Threaten GDPR Compliance

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Alex Scheinman, Director, ACA Compliance

Despite its crucial importance, data protection in a post-Brexit world is not getting the attention it deserves. UK firms have spent a significant time preparing for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as members of the EU. However, Brexit means that they may have to comprehensively re-think their approach and get ready to tackle GDPR from outside of Europe – a very different proposition. Those that fail to comprehend the full impact of Brexit on UK data protection could be in for a nasty shock.

As it creeps closer every day, Brexit, whatever its final form, is threatening to force British companies to reassess how they approach GDPR and data protection. A no-deal Brexit remains a possibility – albeit a slim one – and UK firms have to be prepared for every conceivable type of Brexit. In the worst-case scenario, the EU would no longer automatically confirm the UK as meeting adequate standards for data protection – and the UK would drop down to “third country” status. Data wouldn’t flow from the EU to the UK unless British companies established legal safeguards, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, to remain compliant on data security. Should this happen, companies would be forced to revisit their previous GDPR preparations. Data flows would have to be re-examined to identify personal data transfers from the EU, and new mechanisms would need to be put in place to legitimise these cross-border transfers.

GDPR unquestionably poses a massive question for British firms. But more generally, any organisation that keeps a record of EU personal data is also at risk of being affected. Retail banks and financial managers are obvious culprits for holding customers’ personal data, but asset management firms, whose customers are other institutions, may not think that it does apply. This sort of assumption might not only prove to be wrong, but also costly. Data privacy audits show that company information on HR matters, compensation, contractor relationships, due diligence and so on, can create surprising exposure to GDPR liability.

GDPR is emerging as the new global standard. In an example of the “Brussels effect,” non-EU companies around the world have begun choosing to implement GDPR even though they are not required to. While GDPR compliance will be essential for UK companies doing business in Europe, it may well become requisite in business dealings around the world. Consequently, revisiting GDPR programs early and being prepared for the possibility of a no-deal Brexit are swiftly becoming existential issues.

Reviewing your company’s GDPR plan makes sense from a variety of business perspectives, not just in relation to Brexit. Helping you to reduce, quantify, and manage your risk is an obvious advantage. But this also spills over into other benefits: you avoid the potential for crushing fines; you demonstrate to customers and partners that their data is secure with your company; and you are prepared to effectively manage the inevitable data breaches. But perhaps most importantly, you project the right kind of corporate image by avoiding the wrong kind of headlines. The importance of this cannot be understated in a world where poorly handled data breaches tarnish reputations and destroy trust.

Recent, high-profile leaks have led to people around the world developing a new relationship with their personal data. The expectations over how this data is used and protected are changing faster than anyone could have predicted. And the ICO is already in full swing issuing fines to firms globally. Getting out ahead of this will protect and better position your company for the future. Britain’s relationship with the EU is going to change – no matter what type of Brexit we end up with. Companies with a proactive approach to data protection will gain a competitive advantage over their rivals, as well as avoiding untold risks.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

Non-financial misconduct – encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks to a firm’s culture and operational integrity. Recognizing the profound impact on...

BLOG

FCA Off-Channel Comms Survey Reveals 41% Senior-Level Incidents

On 7 August 2025, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published its multi-firm review into off-channel communications across 11 wholesale banks. Eight of the firms disclosed 178 breaches of their own internal policies over the previous 12 months, with 41% of recorded incidents involving individuals at director grade or above. The FCA stresses that a...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...