About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

New Data Validation Steps Required Under CESR’s Proposed MiFID Client Categorisation Regime Changes

Subscribe to our newsletter

As part of the ongoing review of MiFID, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has published a new consultation paper on the subject of client categorisation that indicates a more structured approach to maintaining and monitoring entity data will be required within European financial institutions. The proposed requirements, which are aimed at strengthening investor protection, introduce new criteria for consideration when categorising clients under MiFID for reporting purposes, which will mean data managers will need to add new steps into the workflow for customer data.

Firms need to add in new data validation steps to ensure that the updated categories are applied to their customer data sets. For example, the consultation paper indicates that CESR is planning to narrow the range of regulated entities that can qualify to be treated as clients who are considered to be professionals. This means firms will have to set up data checking around the three new criteria: whether the entity is regulated or authorised in a jurisdiction with an equivalent regulatory regime to the EU; whether it is conducting business on behalf of underlying clients or not; and the size of the entity. And this is just one of the changes.

Others include geographic distinctions such as whether the entity resides in a member state that has fully implemented the MiFID directive or the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

The aim is to move from a broad brush approach to client categorisation to providing much more clarity about the data items that must be assessed during this process. CESR indicates that tests around a potential client’s knowledge and experience may also be introduced, which would add in a new set of data to the process. It also highlights the current challenges around very complex products and for standards that apply when business is done with eligible counterparties, and asks for feedback about how the industry feels these should be approached.

Many of the other changes are related to the wording of MiFID and although they may seem cosmetic, they could have significant implications on data categorisation. Industry participants should therefore bear these in mind when making any impact assessments of the proposals.

The is therefore asking for feedback about whether the industry is behind these recommended changes and in order to assess the impact of the changes on firms, including their data management teams. Firms have until 9 August to respond to the 11 related questions in the consultation paper.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practice approaches to data management for regulatory reporting

Effective regulatory reporting requires firms to manage vast amounts of data across multiple systems, regions, and regulatory jurisdictions. With increasing scrutiny from regulators and the rising complexity of financial instruments, the need for a streamlined and strategic approach to data management has never been greater. Financial institutions must ensure accuracy, consistency, and timeliness in their...

BLOG

Generali-Natixis Tie-up Highlights Data and Operational Complexities of Asset Management M&A

By Jeremy Katzeff, head of buy-side solutions at GoldenSource. After much speculation, it’s now confirmed. The asset management industry welcomes another mega fund to its ranks after the tie-up between the asset management businesses of Natixis and Generali Group. The reasons behind the merger are the same as they have been for the last few...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit New York

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

Managing Valuations Data for Optimal Risk Management

The US corporate actions market has long been characterised as paper-based and manually intensive, but it seems that much progress is being made of late to tackle the lack of automation due to the introduction of four little letters: XBRL. According to a survey by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and standards...