About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

More Uncertainty Around PRIIPs Compliance Deadline

Subscribe to our newsletter

Uncertainty around the compliance deadline for EU regulation Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance Products (PRIIPs) was underlined this week when the European Parliament voted against the Level 2 Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) supplementing the regulation. PRIIPS is due to take effect on 31 December 2016, but this second vote objecting to the RTS brings the deadline into doubt. The Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) Committee of the European Parliament rejected the RTS earlier this month.

In the wake of the European Parliament vote, the Parliament has called on the European Commission to consider postponing the application date of the Level 1 regulation so it doesn’t enter into force without the RTS.

What the Commission will do next is not yet clear. It could adopt new RTS taking into account the objections of the Parliament and take these to a further parliamentary vote next month. Alternatively, it could propose to postpone the level 1 regulation, or it could do nothing. The latter is unlikely, but would lead to no change to the 31 December 2016 deadline as the European Parliament alone cannot initiate a formal delay of the regulation or force the Commission to postpone the date.

Despite the ongoing uncertainty, providers of PRIIPs solutions continue to encourage firms within the regulation’s scope to press on with compliance programmes. Philip Lynch, head of markets, products and strategy at SIX Financial Information, says: “Our message to industry is clear: don’t delay in preparing for PRIIPs. While the parliamentary vote may shed doubt on the implementation timetable, the decision does not change the significant demands that PRIIPs puts on the industry. Even in the event of a delay, compliance pressure is in no way reduced by the vote, particularly because preparing for the arrival of MiFID II already gives firms a full workload during 2017.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

Non-financial misconduct – encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks to a firm’s culture and operational integrity. Recognizing the profound impact on...

BLOG

Funding Regulatory Oversight: 2026 Budgets for US Supervisors

On January 11, 2026, the House Appropriations Committee released conferenced versions of two major fiscal year 2026 spending measures: the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) bill and the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs (NSRP) bill. While appropriations announcements rarely attract sustained market attention, these packages carry direct implications for how financial...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management Europe 2010

he US may seem to be ahead of the rest of the world in terms of championing the data management cause with the inclusion of reference data focused items in the Dodd-Frank Act, but Europe is not too far behind. Senior European level officials such as European Central Bank (ECB) president Jean-Claude Trichet have taken...