The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Response Depends On Organizing Data, Sticking To Exchanges

Transparency of financial market activity will be key to achieving compliance with MiFID II best execution provisions, states independent industry consultant Chris Pickles, who will be on a panel discussing data management under the European Union directive, at the Intelligent Trading Summit (ITS) to be hosted by A-Team Group in London on 2nd February.

“MiFID II is a fairly heavyweight tuning exercise,” says Pickles. “The regulators are gradually working their way through the learning process of what transparency is about.”

With the UK’s exit from the European Union proceeding, the UK will need to create regulations that are consistent with MiFID II as a directive — for UK markets to continue to transact cross-border trading with EU member countries. If Brexit had not proceeded, MiFID II’s related MiFIR regulation would have automatically applied to UK market activity.

“EU regulations are founded on an underlying belief that has built up over the last dozen years that trading must be done on an exchange for it to be transparent,” says Pickles, alluding to the approach that UK regulators will need to take to writing regulations consistent with MiFID II.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) construction of its Financial Instruments Reference Data System (FIRDS) will inevitably generate more data output, as Pickles says. The ITS session is set to cover the topic of “Keeping up with the data management deluge.”

“ESMA will have to carry a super set of all instruments because they have to regulate every single financial institution across the EU,” says Pickles. “They have to be the superset of all the banks, all the exchanges and all the OTC trading venues. There’s a massive reference database there.”

Generating more data, and then getting an organized reference database of that data, can lead to “the degree of transparency that’s needed across [European] markets,” he adds. This will also set up the data operations and compliance climate for an eventual “MiFID III” update of the EU directive, according to Pickles.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Developing operational resilience

Financial institutions’ operational resilience – essentially the ability to prevent, adapt and respond to, and recover and learn from operational disruptions – has come under extreme pressure during the coronavirus pandemic, with last year’s March lockdown creating unprecedented circumstances for financial firms. Employees working from home raised the stakes, as they still do, adding to...

BLOG

Two Golden Sources: How Will the New FCA FIRDS System Hold Up Post-Brexit?

At the end of 2020 the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) lost access to the EU’s MiFID database: instead launching its own FIRDS system. It’s a big change, and it could have a significant impact on the way firms are able to manage their transaction reporting requirements. The new FCA FIRDS database was built to...

EVENT

RegTech Summit Virtual

The RegTech Summit Virtual is a global online event that will be held in June 2021 with an exceptional guest speaker line up of RegTech practitioners, regulators, start-ups and solution providers to collaborate and discuss innovative and effective approaches for building a better regulatory environment.

GUIDE

Managing Valuations Data for Optimal Risk Management

The US corporate actions market has long been characterised as paper-based and manually intensive, but it seems that much progress is being made of late to tackle the lack of automation due to the introduction of four little letters: XBRL. According to a survey by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and standards...