The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Proposals: Perspective from MarketAxess

MarketAxess Holdings, the operator of a leading electronic trading platform for U.S. and European high-grade corporate bonds, emerging markets bonds and other fixed income securities, reiterates its views on the range of proposals outlined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), which is scheduled to be finalized in October.

MarketAxess believes that:

  • the introduction of a consolidated trade tape for the European over-the-counter markets would enhance price transparency and facilitate measurement of best execution;
  • multi-dealer electronic trading venues can improve market efficiency through enhanced transparency and increased competition.

We have concerns that:

  • a prescriptive pre-trade transparency regime in OTC markets would not provide any meaningful additional price transparency;
  • a consolidated tape run by a single or competing entity could lead to conflicts of interest; and
  • divergent regulatory standards for derivatives trading between Europe and the US would be harmful to investors.

Consolidated Tape

MarketAxess is a strong believer in the introduction of a consolidated trade tape. Experience in the U.S. shows that an appropriately administered consolidated trade tape increases price transparency without harming liquidity. In addition, it provides a tool for measuring best execution in OTC markets.

Pre-trade transparency

We do not believe that a prescriptive regime in over-the-counter (OTC) markets, requiring publication of pre-trade data in a continuous manner, would provide any meaningful additional price transparency over and above that provided by a real-time consolidated trade tape. It is our experience that larger, institutional size trades are more effectively conducted on a request-for-quote (RFQ) basis.

In less liquid markets, where the range of instruments traded is numerous but the volume in each is low, participants are not generally prepared to publish pre-trade information on larger trade sizes or to make pre-trade prices executable.

Post-trade transparency

MarketAxess supports the European Commission’s objective of improving post-trade transparency and thinks that an appropriate benchmark when considering the timing for publication of trade information in the fixed income markets would be the 15 minute reporting deadline adopted for FINRA’s (“Financial Industry Regulatory Authority”) TRACE (“Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine”) tape in the U.S. However, we believe that a mechanism needs to be included that prevents trades that might have market impact from being immediately disseminated with full trade details.

Electronic trade execution

MarketAxess supports the European Commission’s approach that requires greater use of electronic trading venues. MarketAxess believes that multi-dealer venues improve market efficiencies through enhanced transparency and increased competition. Our detailed, quantifiable analysis demonstrates that in less liquid markets, such as corporate bonds, investors receive a better price of execution when a larger group of dealers are put into competition. As such we recommend that for more standardized OTC transactions, the venue of choice should be a multi-lateral trading facility (MTF).

Regulatory divergence

We have serious concerns that the introduction of organized trading facilities (OTFs) may create divergent regulatory regimes for derivatives trading in Europe and the U.S., which could lead to regulatory arbitrage. In the US, standardized derivatives will only be able to trade on an exchange or a swap execution facility (“SEF”). For example, although in the U.S. it does not appear that the SEF definition will allow for single dealer venues, such venues could be permitted under MiFID II.

Conclusion

MarketAxess supports the European Commission in its aim to bring greater transparency to the over-the-counter markets and we believe that greater use of electronic trading venues is central to achieving this. Based on our experience of the U.S. over-the-counter markets, we also believe that the introduction of a consolidated trade tape will provide a key benchmark against which best execution can be measured in these markets.

Through our detailed research and analysis, we have been able to derive statistically robust data to support the advantages of electronic trading to achieve greater price transparency and efficiency of execution.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practices for regulatory reporting

Regulatory reporting has been a cost and resource burden for financial institutions for many years, with the race to compliance in a highly regulated market often leading to multiple, singular regulatory reporting solutions. Legacy systems add to the challenges of making reporting changes in line with adapted and new regulations. This webinar will address these...

BLOG

LGT Capital Partners Selects SimCorp to Advance Digitisation and Support Global Scale and Growth

LGT Capital Partners, a global specialist in alternative investing with US$75 billion assets under management, has signed an agreement with SimCorp to advance digitisation of its investment operations and support global scale and growth. The contract has a committed average annual value of €2 million and covers the use of SimCorp’s cloud-based investment management platform,...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Summit 2022

This summit will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Seventh Edition

Sourcing entity data and ensuring efficient and effective entity data management is a challenge for many financial institutions as volumes of data rise, more regulations require entity data in reporting, and the fight again financial crime is escalated by bad actors using increasingly sophisticated techniques to attack processes and systems. That said, based on best...