About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Letter to the Editor

Subscribe to our newsletter

From Akber Datoo, Managing Partner, D2 Legal Technology

Earlier this week, the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) outlining the framework of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).

While some may consider this as progress, it is unfortunately yet another indicator of the significant challenges the international finance industry – both financial institutions and regulators – faces in successfully addressing risk mitigation from OTC derivatives.

While the broad parameters of the G20 reform programme to increase transparency and limit excessive and opaque risk taking make complete sense and are welcomed, the reality paints a different picture:

(i) In August 2014, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) requested a two-year period after the publication of the full set of final rules to put margin arrangements in place. Even with this week’s announcement, the industry still does not have this full set of final rules, and we still await rules from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Monetary Authority of Singapore, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Japanese Financial Services Agency and Australia. If it has taken this long to define the final rules, surely it has to be understood that the implementation phase also needs time to get it right.

(ii) As it becomes increasingly apparent that regional differences in the final rules will cause market fragmentation and unintended consequences, the question has to be asked: as regulators realise the impact of unharmonised rules, will some of the published final rules become ‘pencilled final rules’ rather than ‘dry ink final rules’?

The significance of the operational changes and documentation challenges associated with margin reform are not to be underestimated. While financial institutions themselves are hardly faultless, if the industry collectively is to truly address this critical aspect of international banking it is high time for the regulators to take greater responsibility for providing clear and coordinated guidance, as well as sufficient time to implement. Getting the implementation wrong simply makes the financial system a less stable place rather than the safer haven underpinning the goal of the regulation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practice approaches to data management for regulatory reporting

Effective regulatory reporting requires firms to manage vast amounts of data across multiple systems, regions, and regulatory jurisdictions. With increasing scrutiny from regulators and the rising complexity of financial instruments, the need for a streamlined and strategic approach to data management has never been greater. Financial institutions must ensure accuracy, consistency, and timeliness in their...

BLOG

Challenges of the New Regulatory Landscape: Data Management Summit London Preview

The regulatory landscape for financial institutions has rarely been in greater flux than now, placing new challenges on the technology and data that will be critical to satisfying the requirements of overseers. While digital innovations are offering organisations the opportunity to meet their compliance obligations with greater accuracy and efficiency, they are also encouraging regulators...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...