The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Keeping a Team Onshore to Monitor Data Quality is Key, Agrees Offshoring and Outsourcing Panel

Institutions should keep a small team of data experts on board in order to adequately monitor that service level agreements are being met by outsourcing providers and data requirements are being catered to by offshore teams, agreed FIMA 2008’s panel on offshoring and outsourcing.

Susan Outzen, business relationship manager in the enterprise data management (EDM) division at HSBC, talked about her previous experience at UBS, where the bank kept a small team onshore to deal with high risk data while they outsourced the low risk data. “It was good to have that expertise remaining in-house to monitor what was going on and reacting to any problems that the outsourced unit experienced,” she explained. HSBC has decided to take the offshoring approach to deal with capacity issues and increase their data capacity across the organisation, Outzen continued. “It was not primarily driven by cost savings because these were only around 25-30%,” she said.

Predrag Dizdarevic, president of KonsultLab and chair of the panel, recommended finding a good onshore team to control the outsourcing or offshoring relationship. Jean Pierre Gottdiener, independent consultant, seconded this notion and urged firms to hire an “available and aware” team. “The staff needs to be aware of the issues that may crop up and the service level agreement must be very clear,” he added.

Dizdarevic listed some of the potential pitfalls within outsourcing agreements for the delegation and these included issues such as liability when a vendor makes a mistake, complications in the internal delivery of data and meeting certain legal requirements. He said that pricing could also be an issue: “Don’t expect these vendors to offer a commoditised price because this business is in the early stages of development and they are likely to charge higher one off project rates.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Brexit: Reviewing the regulatory landscape and the data management response

With Brexit behind us and the UK establishing its own regulatory regime having failed to reach equivalence with the EU, financial firms face challenges of double reporting, uncertainty about UK regulation, and a potential exodus of top talent. The data management response is not easy and could stretch some firms to the limit as they...

BLOG

DSB Publishes Final Report on a Fee Model for the UPI

The Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB) has published its final report on a fee model for the Unique Product Identifier (UPI) that will come into play in July 2022. The report – Principles Underlying the Fee Model for the Unique Product Identifier (UPI) Service – is based on two consultation papers and considers both the UPI...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

TradingTech Summit London will explore how trading firms are innovating in today’s cloud and digital based environment to create flexible, scalable trading platforms to support speed to market and business agility. Leveraging the cloud, AI and ML technologies to get an edge, automate processes and simplify operations in a cost effective way is the name of the game and will share practical insight from practitioners and technology leaders who are innovating and driving forward change in trading operations.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2014

Welcome to the inaugural edition of the A-Team Regulatory Data Handbook. We trust you’ll find this guide a useful addition to the resources at your disposal as you navigate the maze of emerging regulations that are making ever more strenuous reporting demands on financial institutions everywhere. In putting the Handbook together, our rationale has been...