The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Industry Groups RDUG, Redac Talk Of Merger

Share article

The two reference data industry groups – the US-based Reference Data Coalition (Redac) and the European Reference Data Users Group (RDUG) – are close to finalising details of how to merge their activities”.

With the focus of both groups in the same area, it would seem a logical step to merge the efforts, providing the initiatives with greater scale and resource. Officials of both groups have been making joint presentations. “I think it is a solid idea and everyone is pretty much in agreement,” says Mike Atkin, vice president of the Financial Information Services Division (FISD) of the Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA).

The groups are also starting to move towards having their efforts accepted into the International Standards Organisation’s process for definition.

Redac was established by the FISD to ensure that groups working in the reference data area, such as RDUG and the International Securities Association for Institutional Trade Communication (ISITC) are aligned with the primary objectives of the overall coalition.

Atkin says that a formal alignment of Redac and RDUG makes particular sense in the wake of Reuters’ withdrawal from administrative support of RDUG following the closure of its STP consultancy group and subsequent redundancy of Tony Kirby, secretary of RDUG. He stresses, however, that this is unrelated to the vendor’s involvement in the standards development process.

Kirby says, “The goal of Redac is not to take over other groups, it is to bring all the people that are working on reference data stuff together under a common agenda. If people want to get together independently, identify problems and come up with recommendations, then we think that’s great and support it. RDUG is, however, now faced with a lack of staff support, which is all-important when everybody has their real jobs to do.”

The focus of RDUG has been on instrument identification and fund level identification. On the former, says Atkin, RDUG agrees, “this is being handled correctly by the work that FISD is doing and there is no need to add any more to that”. The fund identification work has now also been passed to FISD. “They’ve passed that to me and I’m going to shop that around, with ISO, to make sure that it matches up with the activity taking place (in ISO sub-committees) and to make sure that there is a plan in place to evaluate the proposal and make sure that it can be managed properly. If you want it to be an ISO standard, you’ve got to go through all the ISO processes,” says Atkin.

“The question we have is can this funds level identification proposal stand on its own or does it have to be part of a total business entity identification process? If it can stand alone, is it a good proposal? I’m assuming it’s great, because the people that worked on it are smart, but let’s makes sure that we’ve got buy-in from the companies that matter.”

The coming together of the various bodies is eased by the fact that many of the faces are the same at their different meetings. Atkin points out that four members of the RDUG executive committee are also on the Redac steering body. “What we don’t want to do is lose the global make-up of the conversation. We need to make sure that European issues are understood, that US issues are understood – and we want to do everything we can to make sure that the Asian market is plugged in,” he says. “We are going to have to go to Asia and say ‘please join us’, because they have the same problems.”

As well as the bodies coming together, the standards – proposed and existing – are starting to come together into a form that can go through the ISO adoption process, though most will be introduced or adopted in the industry before that.

Central here is the convergence of initiatives including: ISO 15022, a messaging standard for trade confirmation messages; the FIX Protocol group’s work on pre-trade information; and Market Data Definition Language (MDDL), an XML protocol for reference data being developed by the FISD. The new XML version of ISO 15022, has taken some steps towards integration, particularly with FIX, and Atkin says, “in essence completes the work of what was working group 10 (WG10).”

The key element of 15022 is the datafield dictionary, but it is not complete in that it doesn’t include elements such as pre-trade data, reference data, corporate actions or settlement information. All of this falls into the lap of ISO technical committee 68 sub committee 4 (technically referred to as TC68SC4).

“SC4 is saying that we need a more comprehensive data dictionary, the output of which will be a vocabulary translated into 15022 messages, and it will be a full data model,” says Atkin. “They are now gearing up to manage that, with the creation of WG11. FISD will be part of that, and MDDL is the area that is focussing on reference data and corporate actions. In ISO parlance it is these financial instrument attributes that are not yet in the 15022 datafields. We are all going to dump our vocabularies into this new data model.”

“Standards fall into three distinct categories: standards for identifying things – be it instruments, entities, funds or counterparties; standards for content, which is the vocabulary; and standards for messaging,” says Atkin. “All of those need to be ISO standards, so we all report to SC4, and take our direction from them on how they want to manage the process correctly. Part of the concern that we all have is the difference between the industry’s timeframes and the ISO process timeframes and we’re going to have to let ISO figure out that part of it,” says Atkin. “We are not waiting for ISO to do the work, though. We’re going ahead and doing it now, but we want it to be ISO standard and hopefully they can work out how to expedite their activities. We intend to work through and with them.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Last minute preparations for SFTR: What still needs to be done and are we ready?

The regulation clock is ticking. Financial firms, especially those subject to Phase I of implementation, are well aware of the impending April 2020 deadline for the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation. The question is, are they ready? Tactical, i.e painful, approaches to compliance won’t be good enough. A strategic plan of attack is necessary to combat...

BLOG

ISO Standardises Process of Embedding LEIs in Digital Certificates

ISO has defined a standard approach for Certification Authorities to embed Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs) within digital certificates. The move to simplify LEI integration paves the way for all digital certificates to be linked by a universal identifier to verified and regularly updated entity reference data, in a freely accessible repository, and also can contain the...

EVENT

RegTech Summit Virtual

The RegTech Summit Virtual which took place in June 2020 was a huge success with over 1,100 delegates registered. We are currently working on our plans for 2021 and we hope to be back with an in-person event. Whatever the future holds you can guarantee our 2021 event will be back with an exceptional guest speaker line up of Regtech practitioners, regulators, start-ups and solution providers to collaborate and discuss innovative and effective approaches for building a better regulatory environment. Can't wait until 2021? make sure you sign up to our RegTech Summit Virtual, November 2020. More info...

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management, 2010 Edition

The global regulatory community has become increasingly aware of the data management challenge within financial institutions, as it struggles with its own challenge of better tracking systemic risk across financial markets. The US regulator in particular is seemingly keen to kick off a standardisation process and also wants the regulatory community to begin collecting additional...