About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Go West, Old Exchange!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Following the EU’s block of the London Stock Exchange merger with Deutsche Boerse, LSE could consider North American suitors with lower regulatory hurdles

By: Jim Northey, Principal Services Consultant, Itiviti

Coming as no surprise on the same day as the letter invoking Article 50 to separate the UK from the European Union, the EU on March 29 blocked the all but forgone merger between the London Stock Exchange Group and Deutsche Boerse.

The proposed merger was an unwieldy deal from the start. There were considerable questions regarding how the two companies with highly distinct operations, technological implementations, and cultures could be merged together to provide economies of scale and synergies required by shareholders. In many ways, the deal became the ultimate tale of bad timing. Due to the tsunamis of MiFID II deadlines, Brexit, and the election of Donald Trump, a deal often categorised by industry pundits as an act of desperation, came to a halt in Brussels.

Both the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK are holding to their statement that Brexit will have no impact on the applicability of MiFID II nor its January 3, 2018 effective date. One has to wonder if the political negotiations that will go on for two years will undermine the mandate behind MiFID II and the unity presented by ESMA and the FCA. One would expect that the threat (or opportunity) of regulatory arbitrage will be employed during the Brexit negotiations. The Deutsche Boerse will be relatively immune to this wrangling.

However, the LSE Group, in the presence of disparate, and possibly even conflicting regulatory regimes in the future, may be faced with excessive costs of multiple regulatory regimes. One wonders if the LSE may look west for a US or Canadian suitor, in light of the CBOE-BATS merger. One would think that after the successful digestion of the NYSE and Interactive Data Corporation (IDC) that the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) would be a leading candidate yet again. One gets the idea that the courtship of the LSE will continue as it has for nearly 20 years. With President Trump, Brexit, and a resolute EU, regulatory arbitrage opportunities will be the area to watch.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

The Silo Tax: Why the Buy-Side Trading Desk can No Longer Afford its Own Structure

Take a look at any large buy-side trading operation and the architecture is much the same as it was a decade ago: separate teams for equities, FX, and fixed income, each running its own systems, its own data feeds, and its own operational headcount. The asset classes are different, the rationale runs, so the desks must be...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...