About a-team Marketing Services
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Firms Likely to Wait Until November Deadline to Comply with AII Reporting Requirements, Says Xtrakter’s Dingley

Subscribe to our newsletter

Although the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has provided a four month window for firms to become compliant with transaction reporting using the Alternative Instrument Identifier (AII), firms are likely to wait until the final November deadline for compliance before they begin using the new derivative instrument ID, according to Christopher Dingley, product manager for transaction reporting and matching at Xtrakter. The trade matching and regulatory reporting solution vendor arm of Euroclear this month launched its own functionality aimed at facilitating this type of reporting, which Dingley reckons will gain sufficient traction to allow it to be a pre-eminent provider in the AII space.

Xtrakter this month launched functionality to allow the reporting of derivatives transactions to the FSA using the AII methodology, which was devised by the Federation of European Securities Exchanges (FESE) and adopted as a standard by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) in 2007 as part of MiFID, but was not implemented by the FSA until this year. CESR (now the European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA) had originally wanted each competent authority (CA) to collect this information and share relevant reports with other CAs by November 2008, one year after MiFID went live. However, the FSA and approved reporting mechanisms (ARMs) found the practical reality of implementation was much harder than first thought.

It is this delay and the subsequent “mothballing” of the various transaction reporting projects internally within financial institutions that Dingley reckons will hold back adoption ahead of the deadline. “The FSA has provided a window from the 8 August until the 13 November for firms to become compliant, at which point they must report with AII. The projects have been mothballed inside firms for two years and so they will need to look at the changes that have occurred in that period in terms of AII reporting. Firms, I believe, were ready to report in 2009 but are more likely to wait until the November date rather than implementing now,” he explains.

This, of course, means that vendors such as Xtrakter and rival London Stock Exchange (LSE), which also recently launched its AII solution alongside its acquisition of the FSA’s Transaction Reporting System (TRS), will have to wait for the related revenue stream to roll in. In fact, Dingley notes that it has been waiting much longer than a few months: “Xtrakter was approved for transaction reporting with AII pre-the original 2009 deadline, so we have been ready since September 2009.”

Once it happens though, Dingley is confident that in spite of the competition, which he will not comment upon, Xtrakter will gain sufficient market share. “Xtrakter will aim to be one of the pre-eminent providers in the AII space and I believe we stand a good chance because of our provision of ease of adoption as well as the dashboard and management information visibility. We aim at becoming a premier regulatory reporting provider,” he contends.

Regarding the functionality he is referring to, Xtrakter claims that all firms are able to report in real time or through its XML or flat file batch systems to the FSA’s transaction reporting system and send AII through the vendor, which it will then validate and apply all of its transaction reporting services to, before sending to the FSA. “We offer full offer full compatibility and validation of the AII before it goes off to the FSA to ensure firms report in a compliant manner,” he says.

In terms of extra functionality and the dashboard he mentions: “The biggest thing we have launched this year has been the Trax dashboard, which provides clients with full transaction reporting lifecycle analysis of all of firms’ transaction reporting to the FSA, from their systems, through our systems onto the FSA. We provide a full history and summary reports, all via a customisable, web-based front end. Firms can download all of their transaction reports and all statuses as a real value add and AII is fully integrated into that.”

Trax also currently enables its users to report derivatives transactions using AII to the Dutch and French regulators, namely De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) of the Netherlands and Autorité Des Marchés Financiers (AMF) of France, both of which are also either on the LSE’s radar or currently on its list of reporting capabilities. “We offer real-time reporting for trades in Belgian government debt issues,” adds Dingley. Unlike the LSE, however, Xtrakter is not looking to offer reporting capabilities beyond these markets at the moment.

The AII is composed of six elements: the ISO 10383 market identifier code (MIC) of the regulated market where the derivative is traded; the exchange product code (the code assigned to the derivative by the regulated market where it is traded); derivative type (identifying whether the derivative is an option or a future; put/call identifier (mandatory where the derivative is an option); expiry/delivery/prompt date (exercise date/maturity date of a derivative); and strike price (mandatory where the derivative is an option). The only new element is the exchange product code, as firms reporting transactions in OTC derivatives already use many of the other elements.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: A practical guide to dual UK and EU regulatory reporting as the Temporary Permission Regime comes to a close

Date: 19 July 2022 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The Temporary Permission Regime (TPR) allowing capital markets participants in the European Economic Area (EEA) to continue to operate in the UK post Brexit will be withdrawn by the end of 2023, calling on firms that want to stay...

BLOG

Need for Regulatory Clarity on Digital Assets Emerges as Key Theme at A-Team’s TradingTech Summit

The need for regulatory clarity emerged as the issue most needing resolution before institutions fully embrace the world of digital assets, delegates at A-Team Group’s TradingTech Summit in London heard. The TradingTech Summit saw a welcome return to the physical world this week, following last year’s break due to the Covid-induced lockdown. The event was...

EVENT

Data Management Summit Virtual (Redirected)

The Data Management Summit Virtual brings together the global data management community to share lessons learned, best practice guidance and latest innovations to emerge from the recent crisis. Hear from leading data practitioners and innovators from the UK, US and Europe who will share insights into how they are pushing the boundaries with data to deliver value with flexible but resilient data driven strategies.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2021/2022 – Ninth Edition

Welcome to the ninth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication dedicated to helping you gain a full understanding of regulations related to your organisation from the details of requirements to best practice implementation. This edition of the handbook includes a focus on regulations being rolled out to bring order and standardisation to...