About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Existing Regulation Could Spur On Corporate Actions STP, Aite Predicts

Subscribe to our newsletter

The lack of an explicit regulatory imperative to address the efficiency of corporate actions processing is often cited as a reason for the industry’s lack of progress towards this goal. While it’s true that efforts like Giovannini do include corporate actions, there is no specific directive or legislation that demands firms meet a standard for corporate actions STP. And there is also some confusion about the implications of different industry-wide efforts to effect improved corporate actions efficiency – about the overlap between, say, how Euroclear’s move to a single platform impacts corporate actions, and the work of the Securities Market Practice Group to instil best practices in this area.

While making this point, a new report from analyst Aite Group – Corporate Actions Market Overview: The Back Office Comes to the Fore – also makes the interesting observation that corporate actions could come under the scope of some existing and powerful regulation. The analyst speculates for example that if the best execution element of MiFID were to be extended even if just in spirit to corporate actions processing then an important customer service angle could come into play. Asset owners might start to demand of their asset servicers the best performance possible when it comes to corporate actions, in the same way as clients can now demand best execution for trades from their counterparties. Aite also points out that the Transparency Directive will impose best practices on at least the proxy voting element of corporate actions. Additionally, the analyst makes the point – which has also been made elsewhere – that there is an increasing demand from the front office for more timely and accurate information about corporate actions. This too could push firms to improve corporate actions processing, and relates to efforts we’ve seen recently from data vendors to provide more frequent updates of corporate event information.

Overall, Aite reckons, these factors are helping corporate actions to shed their reputation as a boring back office concern and climb right up firms’ agendas.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at buy-side and sell-side institutions across the USA, UK and Canada, reveals a market in transition: from...

BLOG

Reconciliation No Longer Has Time On Its Side as T+1 Approaches

By John Bevil, senior product manager at Xceptor. Europe’s capital markets firms are entering the most consequential phase of T+1 preparation. From 11 October 2027, trades executed in European markets are expected to settle one business day after trade date, reducing the settlement cycle from T+2 to T+1. More than 4 trillion euros of securities...

EVENT

Digital Assets & Tokenisation Briefing, New York

A-Team Group’s Digital Assets & Tokenisation Briefing assembles an exclusive group of CxOs and senior technology innovators. These leading market practitioners and infrastructure providers are collectively building the digital rails and decentralised networks that will power Wall Street 2.0.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...