The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ESMA States its Case on Distributed Ledger Technology

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has stepped into industry discussion on the pros and cons of distributed ledger – or blockchain – technology (DLT) and concluded that regulatory action is premature at this stage, but may not be in the longer term.

The authority issued a report this week, The Distributed Ledger Technology Applied to Securities Markets, that is based on responses to a discussion paper issued in June 2016 and sets out ESMA’s views on DLT, its potential applications, benefits, risks and how it maps to existing EU regulation.

The report anticipates that early applications of DLT will focus on optimising processes under the current market structure, particularly less automated processes in low volume market segments. Longer term, and based on industry responses to the discussion paper, it notes the potential of the technology to support clearing and settlement activities.

Possible benefits of DLT in securities markets include more efficient post-trade processes, enhanced reporting and supervisory functions, greater security and availability, and reduced counterparty risk and enhanced collateral management, all of which should lead to cost reductions for financial service providers and their users.

The challenges of DLT discussed in the report include the need for a critical mass of market participants in a segment to adopt the technology, interoperability, governance and privacy issues, and scaling. Potential risks outlined in the report include cyber attacks, fraudulent activity, operational risk if errors are disseminated, fair competition issues, and market volatility.

Taking a stance on regulation and DLT, the report concludes: “ESMA’s understanding is that the current EU regulatory framework does not represent an obstacle to the emergence of DLT in the short term. Meanwhile, some existing requirements may become less relevant through time. New requirements might on the contrary be needed to address emerging risks. Also, a number of concepts or principles, for example the legal certainty attached to DLT records or settlement finality, may require clarification as DLT develops.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Data Standards – progress and case studies

Global data standards and identifiers are essential to business growth, market stability and cost reduction – but they can be challenging to implement, while a lack of consistency across jurisdictions has presented obstacles to global take-up. However, with regulators starting to sit up and take note, the issue of data standards is coming increasingly to...

BLOG

Kingland Plans Geographic, Product and Team Growth Following Private Equity Investment

Kingland Systems is planning to extend its geographic reach, expand use cases of its cloud-based data management, automation and discovery platform, and grow its team following a minority investment in the company by private equity investment firm Abry Partners. While maintaining its focus on capital markets, Kingland also plans to move into additional market sectors....

EVENT

RegTech Summit APAC

RegTech Summit APAC will explore the current regulatory environment in Asia Pacific, the impact of COVID on the RegTech industry and the extent to which the pandemic has acted a catalyst for RegTech adoption in financial markets.

GUIDE

RegTech Suppliers Guide 2020/2021

Welcome to the second edition of A-Team Group’s RegTech Suppliers Guide, an essential aid for financial institutions sourcing innovative solutions to improve their regulatory response, and a showcase for encumbent and new RegTech vendors with offerings designed to match market demand. Available free of charge and based on an industry-wide survey, the guide provides a...