About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

We Can’t Solve the Problems with the Same Thinking That Created Them; Radical Solution is Required to Solve Data Problems, says Avox’s Price

Subscribe to our newsletter

Radical thinking on industry business models is needed in such disastrous times, proselytised Avox’s Ken Price at FIMA this morning. He suggests turning the traditional ‘user in the middle sources multiple vendors’ model on its head so that the users, who after all generate most of the data themselves, become the centre of the model and work alongside vendors and other bodies such as tax authorities, registration authorities, and regulators and more. “There’s a huge amount of power in collaboration,” he said.

Highlighting the value that users already have, and that he suggests can be realised through working through vendors such as Avox, Price says that 70% of changes that are made to the Avox database are triggered by feedback from its clients. He acknowledges that many institutions remain uncomfortable with such an approach, but suggests it is a valid approach to addressing data problems.

“What we’re doing here is preventative maintenance. What is the cost of incorrect data if you do not do this?” he questioned. Citing a client example, the client could not correctly identify the risk level associated with any of its own clients resulting in the regulators insisting those clients were categorised as high risk. The implication was that the firm had to increase the capital withheld for potential losses associated with those clients, to the tune of £10 billion. By then addressing the data and risk classifications of its clients this capital was freed up, enabling the firm to invest elsewhere. “The £10 billion number was directly linked to data management by our client,” said Price.

Also, quoting from a recent study commissioned by Avox majority shareholder Deutsche Borse, the average risk event cost has been calculated to be $20 per event. In the banking sector there have been 90 such recorded events and 45 in the brokerage sector in the course of the year. At this level, the suggested budget that should be put aside to cover the losses stemming from these events is $4 million per year.

By addressing data management in a more radical way, and harnessing the power of the users’ own data through collaboration, the significant benefits of improved quality, reduced cost and increased flexibility can then be realised, said Price.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Hearing from the Experts: AI Governance Best Practices

The rapid spread of artificial intelligence in the financial industry presents data teams with novel challenges. AI’s ability to harvest and utilize vast amounts of data has raised concerns about the privacy and security of sensitive proprietary data and the ethical and legal use of external information. Robust data governance frameworks provide the guardrails needed...

BLOG

A-Team Group Announces Winners of its Data Management Insight Awards Europe 2025

A-Team Group has announced the winners of its Data Management Insight Awards Europe 2025, celebrating the latest outstanding contributions from companies recognised for their innovation, expertise and performance.  Now in its fourth year, these annual awards acknowledge the leading providers of data management solutions, services and consultancy services to capital markets participants across Europe. Established...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – A Solution for Entity Data?

The Global LEI System – or GLEIS – has been in development since the middle of last year. Development has been patchy at times, but much has been done, leaving fewer outstanding issues, but also raising new questions. What’s emerging is a structure for the GLEIS going forward, complete with a mechanism for registering and...