About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Trax Sees UK Approval For MiFID II Reporting As First Step In Europe

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) approval of the approved reporting mechanism (ARM) provided by market data, trade matching and regulatory reporting services company Trax is the first domino in a line that its makers hope will run through European countries by the time MiFID II takes effect in January.

As an ARM, Trax has enhanced the reporting it offered for compliance with MiFID I and added features necessary to enrich data and validate more data fields to report, in keeping with MiFID II, to the FCA’s new Market Data Processor (MDP) system, which is replacing its Zen trade capture system, according to Chris Smith, head of Trax. MiFID II increases the number of fields in transaction reports from 26 to 65, for example, notes Smith.

The FCA’s MDP is expected to open this summer, while it remains unclear when exactly other European nations’ equivalent systems will be live. Some European countries are partnering on single systems, like France and Belgium, and the Scandinavian countries. Trax is preparing its ARM for multiple European systems.

“We’re going through a similar exercise with all the national competent authorities (NCAs) throughout Europe,” says Smith. “Some are more advanced than others. Some have their test systems up and running, although none of them have started consuming files yet. We have been testing some file connectivity with the French and Belgian authorities, using a common platform. We have to connect [to] several of those systems where our clients demand it, so we can carry out our reporting to all those competent authorities and the firms that report to them.

“We hope a good number will be ready to test from the summer onward,” adds Smith. “Whenever they’re ready, we will be there.”

MiFID II reporting obligations mean that firms must choose vendors and partners, he says. “That means looking at your internal abilities and asking for help. Most European financial services industry firms should be well on their way to understanding what their program looks like by now. If they don’t, they really need to get on with it during the course of the second quarter.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Hearing from the Experts: AI Governance Best Practices

9 September 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes The rapid spread of artificial intelligence in the financial industry presents data teams with novel challenges. AI’s ability to harvest and utilize vast amounts of data has raised concerns about the privacy and security of sensitive proprietary data and the ethical...

BLOG

Navigating Divergent AI Regulation – Can Standards Bring Clarity?

Artificial intelligence is transforming financial services, from automating credit assessments to streamlining compliance processes. But while AI capabilities are developing at pace, regulatory frameworks are struggling to keep up. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the contrasting approaches taken by the European Union and the United Kingdom. The EU has opted for a rules-heavy,...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit New York

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...