About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Trax Sees UK Approval For MiFID II Reporting As First Step In Europe

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) approval of the approved reporting mechanism (ARM) provided by market data, trade matching and regulatory reporting services company Trax is the first domino in a line that its makers hope will run through European countries by the time MiFID II takes effect in January.

As an ARM, Trax has enhanced the reporting it offered for compliance with MiFID I and added features necessary to enrich data and validate more data fields to report, in keeping with MiFID II, to the FCA’s new Market Data Processor (MDP) system, which is replacing its Zen trade capture system, according to Chris Smith, head of Trax. MiFID II increases the number of fields in transaction reports from 26 to 65, for example, notes Smith.

The FCA’s MDP is expected to open this summer, while it remains unclear when exactly other European nations’ equivalent systems will be live. Some European countries are partnering on single systems, like France and Belgium, and the Scandinavian countries. Trax is preparing its ARM for multiple European systems.

“We’re going through a similar exercise with all the national competent authorities (NCAs) throughout Europe,” says Smith. “Some are more advanced than others. Some have their test systems up and running, although none of them have started consuming files yet. We have been testing some file connectivity with the French and Belgian authorities, using a common platform. We have to connect [to] several of those systems where our clients demand it, so we can carry out our reporting to all those competent authorities and the firms that report to them.

“We hope a good number will be ready to test from the summer onward,” adds Smith. “Whenever they’re ready, we will be there.”

MiFID II reporting obligations mean that firms must choose vendors and partners, he says. “That means looking at your internal abilities and asking for help. Most European financial services industry firms should be well on their way to understanding what their program looks like by now. If they don’t, they really need to get on with it during the course of the second quarter.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Basel III / FRTB: One Framework, Multiple Timelines, Mounting Pain for Global Firms

For much of the past decade, Basel III has been discussed as a global regulatory reform programme moving at uneven speed, but broadly in the same direction. The UK Prudential Regulation Authority’s confirmation of its Basel 3.1 timetable brings welcome clarity for firms operating in the UK market, yet it also underlines a deeper reality:...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2025 – Thirteenth Edition

Welcome to the thirteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a unique and practical guide to capital markets regulation, regulatory change, and the data and data management requirements of compliance across Europe, the UK, US and Asia-Pacific. This year’s edition lands at a moment of accelerating regulatory divergence and intensifying data focused supervision. Inside,...