About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Thomson Reuters Benchmark Services Unit to Echo RTSL

Subscribe to our newsletter

Thomson Reuters’ decision to set up a subsidiary to provide financial benchmark services reflects not only the company’s strength in this area – it has grown its portfolio of benchmarks to 160 over the past 25 years – but also the wider industry’s desire to distance itself from benchmark scandals and rebuild trust as it moves into a new era of benchmark regulation.

The subsidiary, Thomson Reuters Benchmark Services Limited (TRBSL), is directed by Thomson Reuters executives including global head of indexes and reference rates, John Cooley; global head of reference rates Mark Beaumont; managing director of Financial, Peter Moss; and head of transaction services, Philip Wellard.

On the establishment of a subsidiary for benchmark services, Cooley says: “Creating TRBSL enables Thomson Reuters to provide benchmark services meeting the highest expectations of regulators and clients by placing a strong focus on this business through a separately governed, registered and capitalised entity. This is in line with a similar strategy adopted when Reuters Transaction Services Limited (RTSL) was established to manage transaction service platform activity. RTSL is also authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority [(FCA)] for a defined set of regulated activities.”

TRBSL is readying for the July 1, 2014 deadline for compliance with the International Organization of Securities Commissions’ (IOSCO) principles for benchmark administrators with a change programme that aims to lead to self declaration of compliance with the 19 principles set out by IOSCO. The IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks were published in July 2013 in response to investigations by global regulators and include a framework for benchmark administrators to ensure the quality, integrity, continuity and reliability of benchmarks. From a benchmark user’s perspective, the principles enable objective judgments to be made on the appropriateness of using a particular benchmark as the administrator must make design and methodology documentation available.

Commenting on TRBSL’s commitment to the IOSCO principals, Cooley says: “The establishment of TRBSL enables us to demonstrate robust governance and oversight in alignment with IOSCO principles. TRBSL will produce a set of policy documents to evidence how it meets each of the 19 principles.”

TRBSL is regulated by the UK FCA and has been authorised for Thomson Reuters’ ongoing role as calculator of LIBOR on behalf of ICE Benchmark Administration, which has achieved FCA accreditation for the administration of LIBOR. While LIBOR is, to date, the only regulated benchmark, TRBSL says it will seek authorisation for other benchmarks as and when they are chosen for regulation in their own jurisdictions.

Cooley concludes: “With TRBSL, Thomson Reuters has reaffirmed its strategic commitment to ongoing investment in its benchmark activity, including acting as administrator and providing collection, calculation and publication services for administrators of other benchmarks. Many benchmark administrators are still in the process of reviewing their strategies in light of the additional costs of compliance and the risk of fines from regulatory authorities for non-compliance with administration obligations.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The roles of cloud and managed services in optimising enterprise data management

Cloud and managed services go hand-in-hand when it comes to modern enterprise data management (EDM), but how can the best solutions for the business be selected and implemented to ensure optimal data management based on accurate, consistent, and high-quality data, and delivering improved efficiency, better decisions and competitive advantage? This webinar will answer these questions,...

BLOG

Best Practice Approaches to Trade Surveillance for Market Abuse

Market abuse is a problem, a very big problem for financial institutions that fall on the wrong side of regulation. Penalties include eye-watering fines, reputational damage and, ultimately, custodial sentences of up to 10 years. Internally, market abuse triggers scrutiny of traders and trading behaviours, a lack of trust and the potential need for significant...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

Impact of Derivatives on Reference Data Management

They may be complex and burdened with a bad reputation at the moment, but derivatives are here to stay. Although Bank for International Settlements figures indicate that derivatives trading is down for the first time in 10 years, the asset class has been strongly defended by the banking and brokerage community over the last few...