About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

The Consolidated Tape Iceman Cometh

Subscribe to our newsletter

We read the latest CESR advice on transaction reporting with alarm. In short, it suggested that the market had failed to find its own solution to the challenge of transaction reporting in a fragmented liquidity environment.

But has it?

Since the implementation of MiFID in 2007, the market has seen the launch of a specific, market-supported trade reporting service in the form of MarkitBoat – which, you’ll recall, was set up by a group of investment banks before it was offloaded to Markit. Market data vendors like Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg have introduced consolidated trade data services. And large banks and brokerages have used software from a variety of providers to build their own consolidated post- (and pre-) trade views.

Yet, CESR says: “Since MiFID implementation many data vendors have been delivering consolidated data. However these services are not of a standard that fully satisfies market participants.”

How so?

CESR elucidates thus: “A recurring theme in the analysis of why consolidated data is not being delivered to the market to the standard it needs is the inadequate quality and consistency of the raw data itself, the inconsistencies in the way in which firms report it for publication, and the lack of any formal requirements to publish data through bodies with responsibilities for monitoring the publication processes.”

Fair enough, but CESR goes on: “CESR and market participants generally agree there is a need for an affordable consolidation of post-trade information … “

Yes, in essence, consolidated data is available, but it does cost. And cost seems to be the crux of the issue here. The data is available if you want to pay for it.

In its advice paper, CESR makes recommendations on how to “ensure the quick development of a European consolidated tape for transparency information at a reasonable cost.” CESR is calling for the creation of so-called Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs), which could be an exchange, an MTF or some other entity.

Pre-MiFID, exchanges were in essence APAs. Will more of them boost post-trade transparency? We wonder.

Some have called for the market participants to address this specific sharpish, before the New Regulators come in and create a US-style consolidated tape. FIX Protocol Ltd. has been put forward as a body that could step in and fix things, no pun intended.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Reviewing the Latency Landscape and the Next Generation of Ultra-Low Latency Infrastructure

Date: 17 September 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Ultra-low latency is no longer the preserve of a handful of proprietary trading firms. As new asset classes electronify, data volumes surge, and regulatory expectations around execution quality and resilience tighten, the performance demands on trading infrastructure are broadening...

BLOG

FCA Takes Charge: UK Centralises AML Supervision Across Professional Services

The United Kingdom’s decision to centralise Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) supervision under the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) marks a structural shift that brings professional services oversight in line with the rest of the financial sector. The move aligns the UK with a broader global trend toward consolidation, consistency, and intelligence-led supervision –...

EVENT

RegTech Summit London

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in London will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the European capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

RegTech Suppliers Guide 2020/2021

Welcome to the second edition of A-Team Group’s RegTech Suppliers Guide, an essential aid for financial institutions sourcing innovative solutions to improve their regulatory response, and a showcase for encumbent and new RegTech vendors with offerings designed to match market demand. Available free of charge and based on an industry-wide survey, the guide provides a...