About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Swift Admits CIVIC Plans “Under Review”, as Observers Suggest Business Case Proving Difficult

Subscribe to our newsletter

As Reference Data Review went to press, it emerged that Swift could be having second thoughts about pressing ahead with previously-announced plans to allocate BIC-like codes to funds – dubbed CIVICs (Reference Data Review first brought to light Swift’s CIVIC plans as far back as September 2006).

In light of the failure of the ISO IBEI process to yield any standard global solution for legal entity identification, Swift’s project to clean up and extend BICs and BIC1s had been perceived by some as the pragmatic route towards the IBEI goal. And work has been under way between Swift, Avox (its chosen partner to support it in the BIC clean-up) and a group of banks to establish the way forward for CIVICs.

At this time Swift will say only that “its plans for CIVIC are currently under review”. The co-operative adds that “at this moment we are not planning any formal collaboration with S&P” – Standard & Poor’s having itself recently said it is looking into how to contribute to a global entity identification solution based on the issuer identification component of Cusips.

The problem is reportedly around building a business case for CIVICs. While Swift doesn’t have an issue with providing BICs and BIC1s for well-defined business purposes such as transaction reporting under MiFID, and while it can justify the allocation of identifiers to regulated fund managers and the corporates that would be eligible to use its network under its corporate access programme SCORE, it is reportedly struggling to establish a business case for creating codes for the broader legal entity community that could be used for myriad purposes such as risk management.

The CIVIC initiative would clearly take Swift closer to the realm of the IBEI as envisaged and pursued by ISO WG8. The failure of this effort to yield a useable standard entity identifier so far has been attributed in no small measure to Swift’s historic reluctance to act as the registration authority for a code for which every legal entity – even those outside the Swift customer base now and likely forever – would be eligible. The possibility that Swift will pull back from CIVICs would be consistent with the stance it has always taken on IBEI – that there isn’t sufficient business case for it to take the task on.

Where Swift is reportedly keener to pursue the creation of identifiers to support processes outside requirements such as MiFID is where there is an overlap with further business opportunities it would like to pursue itself, that is where there are more obvious commercial drivers than just an initiative being generally beneficial for industry efficiency. These could include, it is understood, codes for use to support trade enrichment and the appending of standing settlement instructions (SSIs) by Swift – an area it has long toyed with entering but for which it is apparently still in the very early stages of planning.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to automate entity data management and due diligence to ensure efficiency, accuracy and compliance

Requesting, gathering, analysing and monitoring customer, vendor and partner entity data is time consuming, and often a tedious manual process. This can slow down customer relationships and expose financial institutions to risk from inaccurate, incomplete or outdated data – but there are solutions to these problems. This webinar will consider the challenges of sourcing and...

BLOG

The Long and Winding Road to T+1 – A 20+ Year Journey

By Adrian Sharp, Principal, Fairfield Insights. What a long, strange trip it’s been. (Weir, Garcia et al, 1970) Earlier this year, the SEC published the final rules shortening the settlement cycle for US securities from T+2 to T+1 with a target compliance date of May 28, 2024. The case for a shortened settlement cycle remains...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology, London

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London on September 19th at Marriott Hotel Canary Wharf London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2023 – Eleventh Edition

Welcome to the eleventh edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a popular publication that covers new regulations in capital markets, tracks regulatory change, and provides advice on the data, data management and implementation requirements of more than 30 regulations across UK, European, US and Asia-Pacific capital markets. This edition of the handbook includes new...