About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Sell-Side Coverage of European Companies Plummets Post-MiFID II, Finds Cass

Subscribe to our newsletter

A new paper from Cass Business School has found that sell-side analyst coverage of European companies has dropped “significantly” since the implementation of MiFID II in January 2018 – with a whopping 334 firms losing their analyst coverage completely.

The paper, entitled ‘The Effects of MiFID II on Sell-Side Analysts, Buy-Side Analysts, and Firms’, examined the effects of the MiFID II research unbundling requirement on all public firms headquartered in European Economic Area (EEA) countries from February 2015 to February 2019.

On average, the analysts who dropped coverage have higher lifetime forecast errors, higher forecast optimism, less experience on the job, and less experience covering the firm dropped – and the research did not find any significant changes in consensus forecast errors or dispersion. However, the remaining analysts are more likely to make sell or hold stock recommendations, their recommendation revisions garner greater market reactions, and their recommendations are more profitable.

In addition, sell-side analysts seem to cater more to the buy-side after MiFID II by providing industry recommendations along with stock recommendations. Importantly, the research found evidence to suggest that buy-side investment firms have turned to more in-house research after MiFID II implementation, and buy-side analysts have increased their participation and engagement in earnings conference calls.

The paper also found evidence of stock-market liquidity decreases post-MiFID II (after taking into account firms’ disclosure responses and changes in analyst coverage).

“MiFID II represented a shake-up of traditional business practices in Europe and has polarised opinion, with some industry figures being highly critical of its introduction.  We should not be surprised that such sweeping regulatory changes have had such a mixed impact,” says co-author Dr Zhongwei Huang.

“Our findings have implications beyond Europe, as investors are currently pressuring the US Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt a similar regulation.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Proactive RegTech approaches to fighting financial crime

Financial crime is a global problem that costs the economy trillions of dollars a year, despite best efforts by financial services firms, regulators, and governments to stem the flow. As criminals become more sophisticated in how they commit financial crime, so too must capital markets participants working to challenge criminality and secure the global financial...

BLOG

FCA Criticism of Funds’ SDR Approach Stirs Controversy

The UK regulator has criticised fund managers for failing to abide by interim guidance on ESG disclosures just days before it’s expected to announce details of a formal regulation. But the comments have been met with frustration and caution within the ESG data and technology community, with one practitioner arguing that the Financial Conduct Authority...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 8th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the regtech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2023 – Eleventh Edition

Welcome to the eleventh edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a popular publication that covers new regulations in capital markets, tracks regulatory change, and provides advice on the data, data management and implementation requirements of more than 30 regulations across UK, European, US and Asia-Pacific capital markets. This edition of the handbook includes new...