About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

SEC Seeks Comment to Assist in Study on Assigned Credit Ratings, Examines Utility Model

Subscribe to our newsletter

As part of its broader examination of the impact of credit ratings agencies on the financial markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has published a new request for comment on the feasibility of a system in which a public or private utility or a self-regulatory organisation would assign a nationally recognised statistical rating organisation (NRSRO) to determine credit ratings for structured finance products. The regulator is seeking to determine whether such a utility approach (a popular theme throughout Dodd Frank – see the Office of Financial Research for another example) would eliminate conflicts of interest in the ratings assignment process.

Section 939F of the Dodd Frank Act directs the SEC to study the credit rating process for structured finance products and the conflicts associated with the “issuer pay” and the “subscriber pay” models. It also requires the regulator to study the feasibility of establishing a system in which a public or private utility or a self-regulatory organisation could assign NRSROs, of which there are currently 10 registered in the market, to determine the credit ratings for these products.

In addition, the study must address the range of metrics that could be used to determine the accuracy of credit ratings for structured finance products, and alternative means for compensating NRSROs that would create incentives for accurate credit ratings for these products. The regulator has been set a deadline of 21 July next year by which to submit the findings of the study to Congress along with any recommendations for regulatory or statutory changes that it determines should be made.

Accordingly, the regulator is asking interested parties to provide comments, proposals, data and analysis in response to questions presented in the request. The public comment period will remain open for 120 days following publication of the request in the Federal Register.

The issue of “moral hazard” related to the current method of assigning ratings to these products and the way in which firms pay for these services has been a much debated topic since the financial crisis. The big three agencies have come under intense scrutiny for the part they played in the crisis by assigning incorrect ratings to structured products. The regulator is keen to determine where any conflicts of interest currently lie and whether there is any empirical data on which to assess these conflicts, such as differences in the ratings for a particular instrument.

The SEC is therefore posing a number of questions to firms that use these ratings for instruments such as residential mortgage backed securities (RMBSs), commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBSs), collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), collateralised loan obligations (CLOs), or other asset backed securities (ABSs). It is also scrutinising the data collection phase of the process for determining and monitoring credit ratings for structured finance products, including: the types of data collected; the sources from which the data is obtained; whether, and, if so how, the data is validated; whether the data is public or non-public; and how, if at all, the data is captured in the NRSRO’s systems.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: New solutions to the old problems of compliance with communications surveillance regulation

Communications surveillance is an integral element of trading at financial institutions, and its functions are clearly set out in jurisdictional regulations – to capture, record and retain all communications. Essentially, all business related communications must be recorded whatever the underlying mechanism – be it a work phone, personal mobile phone, text, video and so on...

BLOG

RegTech Can Help Solve ESG Data Management and Trust Challenges

As demand for data grows with the acceptance of ESG as a critical part of financial institutions’ business and regulatory activities, focus will intensify on the quality of that information. Asset managers and owners will want the cleanest, most relevant and most comprehensive datasets to identify investment opportunities and risks and to comply with the...

EVENT

RegTech Summit APAC

Now in its 2nd year, the RegTech Summit APAC will bring together the regtech ecosystem to explore how capital markets in the APAC region can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change. With more opportunities than ever before for RegTech to add value, now is the time to invest for the future. Join us to hear from leading RegTech practitioners and innovators who will share insights into how they are tackling the challenges of adopting and implementing regtech and how to advance your RegTech strategy.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2022/2023 – Tenth Edition

Welcome to the tenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication that has tracked new regulations, amendments, implementation and data management requirements as regulatory change has impacted global capital markets participants over the past 10 years. This edition of the handbook includes new regulations and highlights some of the major regulatory interventions challenging...