About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

SEC Penalizes Twelve Firms for Recordkeeping Lapses, Totalling $63 Million in Fines

Subscribe to our newsletter

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has imposed more than $63 million in combined penalties on nine investment advisers and three broker-dealers for failing to properly maintain and preserve required electronic communications. One of the firms received leniency for self-reporting, incurring a substantially reduced penalty.

According to SEC findings, the firms and their personnel relied on unapproved methods—often referred to as “off-channel communications”—to conduct business. These communications, which were required to be retained under federal securities laws, were not appropriately recorded or supervised. Supervisors and senior managers were among those who used these methods, underscoring the widespread nature of the violations.

Collectively, the firms acknowledged the facts in the SEC’s orders, conceded that their actions violated specific recordkeeping provisions, and agreed to pay civil penalties totalling $63.1 million. Each organization is also subject to cease-and-desist orders covering future violations of recordkeeping rules.

While the fines vary across the firms, the SEC noted one notable exception: PJT Partners LP, which proactively self-reported its shortcomings. As a result, the firm faced a substantially lower penalty of $600,000.

A senior figure at the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Sanjay Wadhwa, emphasized the importance of accurate recordkeeping for market transparency and integrity. “When firms fail to comply with books and records requirements, the consequences extend far beyond the mere lack of documentation,” he said, pointing to the crucial role these records play in the SEC’s oversight of the markets. Wadhwa also underscored how self-reporting can lead to tangible benefits, noting that PJT Partners’ cooperation was a key factor in determining its reduced penalty.

Below are the main penalty amounts agreed upon by the various entities:

  • Blackstone Alternative Credit Advisors LP, along with two related Blackstone entities: $12 million
  • Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P.: $11 million
  • Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.: $10 million
  • Apollo Capital Management L.P.: $8.5 million
  • Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., with two affiliated entities: $8.5 million
  • TPG Capital Advisors LLC: $8.5 million
  • Santander US Capital Markets LLC: $4 million
  • PJT Partners LP (self-reported): $600,000

Legal observers note that these actions reflect the SEC’s continued emphasis on accountability and compliance within financial institutions. “This outcome serves as a clear signal that regulators remain vigilant about safeguarding market data and maintaining transparency,” commented an independent securities law analyst. “Firms should be aware that adopting robust recordkeeping policies isn’t optional; it’s a fundamental requirement.”

Matt Smith, CEO at Integrated surveillance provider, SteelEye  puts it more directly noting, “Just two weeks into the new year, the SEC has issued a stark warning to firms with these penalties: lax record-keeping around off-channel communications will not be tolerated. It will come down hard on firms of all sizes and specialties, whether you’re a global tier-one bank, a nimble broker-dealer, or specialist investment advisor.”

The investigations were conducted by multiple SEC offices, with teams led by senior attorneys and supervisors in the agency’s New York Regional Office. Their work underscores the SEC’s ongoing priority to ensure regulated entities fulfil their recordkeeping obligations and maintain proper oversight of communication channels.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Off-Channel Communications Compliance

Managing off-channel communications – business interactions occurring outside of approved corporate systems – continues to challenge firms’ compliance efforts. The rise of personal messaging apps, social media, and other unmonitored channels – for example, messaging functionality embedded in an order management system – exposes firms to substantial regulatory risk. Enforcement actions by regulatory bodies, such...

BLOG

Reporting Seen Among Use Cases Benefiting from Cloud-based Data Management for AI

Artificial intelligence is being adopted by financial regulators at pace, putting pressure on the financial institutions that the overseers serve to double down on their reporting capabilities. It’s no surprise to find that the same AI that’s helping regulators can aid organisations in getting those reporting procedures in place. To do so, however, they need...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 14th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...