About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reval Poll Shows Most End-User Costs Would Increase to Comply with Dodd-Frank

Subscribe to our newsletter

In a live webinar poll last week hosted by Reval, the premiere Software-as-a-Service provider for financial risk management, 68 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives said that they do not have a Credit Support Annex (CSA) in place with counterparties to their OTC derivative contracts, indicating potential cost impacts for key compliance requirements expected under the Dodd-Frank Act. CSA’s are legal documents amending each ISDA Swap Master Agreements (ISDA’s).

In addition, despite the potential headaches and costs associated with the requirement for all market participants to have CSA’s to handle margin requirements, 92 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives polled say they do not expect to decrease their use of the instruments post final rules.

“This validates the importance of OTC derivatives for commercial hedgers of risk as despite the increases in costs coming their way, the need is still there,” says Jiro Okochi, CEO & Co-Founder of Reval, who hosted “Rules, Rules, Rules: Impacts from Derivative Regulation Under Dodd-Frank .” Reval Chief Compliance Officer Patrick Trozzo co-hosted the webinar, which drew over 450 registrants.

“Our webinar was attended by many Fortune 500 companies, so I suspect as you go further downstream in the market, the actual number of companies not having CSA’s would be above 85 percent,” says Okochi. “Most companies will have to negotiate at least 10 ISDA agreements and monitor thresholds and collateral to each of their Swap Dealers. This number could also go up for commodities hedgers as they most likely would have to negotiate new ISDA’s with pushed-out commodities market-making desks from banks.”

Reval’s poll indicated that 41 percent of registrants do not even have ISDA’s in place. “Even for those that have CSA’s and ISDA’s in place with Swap Dealers, all ISDAs would have to be re-negotiated,” Okochi says.

Under the current draft business conduct and margin rules proposed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the regulatory agency working to implement Dodd-Frank, non-financial end-users would be required to obtain a CSA to describe how their company’s swap transactions would be covered under collateral or margin agreements. In addition to the legal costs of amending each ISDA Master Agreement, companies would “have to have the people, processes and systems in place to monitor these CSA agreements,” says Okochi.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Sponsored by FundGuard: NAV Resilience Under DORA, A Year of Lessons Learned

The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) came into force a year ago, and is reshaping how asset managers, asset owners and fund service providers think about operational risk. While DORA’s focus is squarely on ICT resilience and third-party dependencies, its implications extend deep into core operational processes that are critical to market integrity, investor...

BLOG

smartKYC QnA: Accelerating Due Diligence at Scale

Hugo Chamberlain is the chief commercial officer of UK-based smartKYC, which has been automating the KYC process since 2014. Data Management Insight spoke to Hugo to find out how the company is helping financial institutions streamline their onboarding processes. Data Management Insight: Hello Hugo. When was smartKYC created and how does it serve financial institutions?...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...