About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Regulators Continue to Raise Profile of Derivatives Data Challenge, Market Fights Back

Subscribe to our newsletter

In keeping with this year’s regulatory focus on data challenges within financial institutions, this week, US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Mary Schapiro has been discussing the importance of accurately tracking derivatives data. She has been stressing the critical need for regulators to gain more access to information on derivative transactions in order to better monitor market abuses.

This all adds fodder to the canon for data managers, who can use the requirement for better auditing and tracking of derivatives data as a rationale for investment in enterprise data management (EDM) implementations. Schapiro is just one of a number of regulators that have been raising the issue of transparency into the derivatives market, which is all part of the wider overhaul of the global regulatory framework.

In June, Schapiro informed a Senate panel about the difficulties being experienced by the regulatory community in the endeavour to identify derivatives investors and determine the size of their trades. The lack of standardisation within this particularly opaque corner of the market has proved to be antagonising for the regulatory community and this has therefore become an integral part of the overhaul plan.

The decision to force more credit derivatives trades onto exchanges and clearing houses should ensure that a greater level of data standardisation is achieved at the instrument level. The SEC has already done this with the credit default swap market (CDS) and is seeking to expand this approach to other OTC areas.

The European Commission is also keen to effect similar moves in the European region, as indicated by its recently released plans for an overhaul of the derivatives sector enshrined in its consultation paper last month. However, these proposals have not gone down well in all corners of the derivatives market, with many participants wary of forcing CDSs and other derivatives onto exchanges.

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma), and the London Investment Banking Association (Liba) have this week published a joint response to the Commission’s proposals indicating their concerns about going too far in the effort towards derivatives standardisation. “The real economy faces diverse risks and depends on privately negotiated derivatives to address them effectively. As long as risk itself is not standardised, then tailored instruments will remain important,” explains Robert Pickel, chief executive of ISDA.

The Commission is due to publish definitive regulatory proposals by the end of the year, following this period of feedback, and these associations are keen to ensure that the regulatory community does not overstep its bounds. “We believe the regulatory focus should be on process uniformity, not product uniformity,” Pickel continues.

The proposals are likely to include higher capital charges for derivatives brokers that opt not to use electronic platforms for trading and clearing of these instruments and this is where the most controversy seems to lie. ISDA et al believe that existing capital charges are enough to motivate the industry to standardise derivatives data.

They are also wary of the use of centralised data repositories for these instruments because they feel this may hamper attempts to innovate in the market. The statement warns that it is “critical that their usage does not curtail the flow of new products to the market and fully respects the global basis on which these products trade”.

The resistance towards standardisation within the derivatives market has long been a problem for the data management community charged with tracking and keeping on top of this complex data. Hopefully, by raising the profile of the problem, regulators can inspire financial institutions to take matters into their own hands rather than being compelled to comply.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practices for compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation

Date: 18 June 2024 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force in July 2016, rescinding the previous Market Abuse Directive and replacing it with a significantly extended scope of regulatory obligations. Eight years later, and amid constant change in capital markets regulation,...

BLOG

Brown Brothers Harriman Evolves Data Offerings with Infomediary Data Solutions

Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH) has announced the next evolution of its data offerings with Infomediary Data Solutions, an expanded set of solutions that brings together data management technology and managed services and is designed to help asset managers and financial institutions take command of their data. Infomediary Data Solutions builds on BBH’s Infomediary data integration...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

MiFID II Handbook

As the 3 January 2018 compliance deadline for Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) approaches, A-Team Group has pulled together everything you need to know about the regulation in a precise and concise handbook. The MiFID II Handbook, commissioned by Thomson Reuters, provides a guide to aspects of the regulation that will have...