About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Regulated Firms that Don’t Trust Electronic Identification Verification Risk Financial Crime

Subscribe to our newsletter

More than 36% of people in regulated firms who ‘can’t trust’ electronic identity verification technology and instead rely on manual checks are leaving their doors open to financial crime, according to research by anti-money laundering specialist SmartSearch.

This statistic, from SmartSearch’s 2023 annual survey of 500 compliance stakeholders across financial, accountancy, property and legal services, has doubled since the company’s 2022 survey, when 18% percent of people said they couldn’t trust the technology.

Focusing on the financial services sector, the survey shows 40% of compliance stakeholders can’t trust electronic ID verification technology.

“This indicates a significant dip in trust in electronic ID verification technology, despite its recommendation as part of the due diligence process in the Money Laundering and Terrorist Finance Act 2020,” says Fraser Mitchell, technical director at SmartSearch. “Many regulated firms may be unaware of this advice, hence the mistrust. Meantime, criminal gangs are washing billions through the UK’s financial systems. It’s a real concern.”

Looking at manual methods of identification, 87% of survey respondents in regulated firms are naively confident that they could identify a fake document such as a passport, driving licence or utility bill. Looking at the financial sector, the research shows 95% of people believing they could manually spot a fake ID, despite forgery risks.

Nicola Gifford, general counsel at SmartSearch, comments: “This is our third Electronic Verification Uncovered campaign. Our objective is to address common misconceptions among regulated firms, with a view to lowering the barrier to businesses adopting electronic verification as standard practice.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How far should counterparty screening go? Balancing the ideal and the realistic

Counterparty screening is a regulatory requirement, but do you know enough about your clients’ clients, and beyond? How can you source this information and how does it benefit your business? How far do you need to dig into entity ownership structures? This webinar discusses these challenges and how they relate to your organisation, whether you’re...

BLOG

Report Once – ESMA’s Simplification Plan for Regulatory Reporting

ESMA has turned the long-running industry case for “report once” transaction reporting into a staged policy programme for rebuilding EU reporting around reusable, controlled transaction data. Its Final Report On the Call for Evidence recommends a single integrated framework across the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and Securities Financing...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...