About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Poll Results: Operational Risk and Cost Top List of Concerns for RDR Readers

Subscribe to our newsletter

Operational risk and the desire for greater cost savings are the key issues driving financial institutions to invest in their data management infrastructure, according to the latest results of our reader poll. This result is unsurprising really, given the focus on doing ‘more for less’ in the current financial climate.

What is perhaps more surprising is that regulation and compliance are not affecting these projects, despite the recent increase in regulatory scrutiny and predicted increase in compliance spend. Not a single respondent to the Reference Data Review poll highlighted regulation and compliance as a driver for investment in data management. Also out of the spotlight were reputational risk and M&A, each failing to garner any votes as priorities driving data spend.

Operational risk topped the list with 50% of the vote, closely followed by cost savings at 33%. The remaining 17% was attributed to the ‘other’ category, which one can only assume means factors such as improvements to client servicing and the desire to improve data quality.

The obvious reason for this result is that the reduction of operational risk and cost are easier wins when championing the issue of data management within an institution. Senior management’s strict scrutiny of ROI for projects in the current environment means data management projects must provide tangible metrics such as cost savings to get the green light.

The reduction in headcount over the last six months across institutions also means that they have to find alternatives to people to throw at the problem and automation and data centralisation are apparent solutions.

The results of the poll confirm that risk is very much a concern in the market, as noted by a number of recent research reports into the area of data management. But it is surprising that regulation is not a key concern, despite the high profile that regulators are maintaining at the moment. Perhaps the results will tell a different story in six months’ time, once the regulatory ball gets rolling and the market is faced with the prospect of coping with increasingly strict oversight policies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: From Data to Alpha: AI Strategies for Taming Unstructured Data

Unstructured data and text now accounts for the majority of information flowing through financial markets organisations, spanning research content, corporate disclosures, communications, alternative data, and internal documents. While AI has created new opportunities to extract signals, many firms are discovering that value is constrained not by models, but by the quality of the content, architecture,...

BLOG

PS26/2: The FCA Wants Data, Not Declarations on Resilience

The Financial Conduct Authority has moved the UK operational resilience regime into its next phase with PS26/2 on operational incident and third party reporting. Firms have spent the past few years identifying important business services and setting impact tolerances. Supervisors now want structured data that shows how those services hold up under stress. PS26/2 introduces...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

The Data Management Implications of Solvency II

Bombarded by a barrage of incoming regulations, data managers in Europe are looking for the ‘golden copy’ of regulatory requirements: the compliance solution that will give them most bang for the buck in meeting the demands of the rest of the regulations they are faced with. Solvency II may come close as this ‘golden regulation’:...