The modern trading desk, a nexus of high-speed decision-making and complex data flows, is in the midst of profound transformation. At a recent A-Team Group webinar entitled ‘Enhancing Trader Efficiency with Interoperability – Innovative Solutions for Automated and Streamlined Trader Desktops and Workflows’, experts Dan Schleifer, President and co-founder of Interop.io, Richard Leder, CEO of FastFin Labs, and Junaid Arshad, Product Development, Custody Data Management at State Street, explored how interoperability and artificial intelligence (AI) are moving from aspiration to necessity. Sponsored by Interop.io, the discussion highlighted why connecting fragmented systems and embedding intelligence into workflows is now a core driver of competitive advantage.
Addressing the Persistent Hurdles of Trader Efficiency
The panel was candid about the barriers slowing progress. Legacy systems, often multiplied by years of mergers and acquisitions, carry significant technical debt and are difficult to modify without risk. This leaves many firms with multiple platforms performing overlapping functions across desks and asset classes.
Yet, the consensus was clear: efficiency does not require a wholesale ‘rip and replace.’ Instead, incremental, targeted improvements can deliver outsized impact.
“The principle of ‘not boiling the ocean’ is not only sound technical advice; it’s also an organisational reality,” noted Dan Schleifer. “You’re never going to get a massive project approved if you propose a system-wide digital transformation encompassing interoperability, AI, or anything similar across all users and all functions in the front, middle, and back office. That’s simply never going to happen.”
The audience echoed this view: 38% cited manual rekeying of data between systems as their single biggest source of inefficiency. Small, specific fixes, guided by the mantra “if you can describe it, you can automate it,” can eliminate these friction points quickly and safely.
Translating Efficiency into Tangible Business Value
The discussion stressed the importance of linking user-level efficiencies to wider business outcomes. Freeing up even 30 minutes a day for traders has a direct impact: time reclaimed from repetitive admin can be redeployed to portfolio analysis, market liquidity assessment, or client engagement.
Critically, automation must align with the incentives of different trader types; execution traders focused on cost and impact, proprietary traders managing P&L, or portfolio managers driving strategy. Far from threatening jobs, automation equips traders with the ‘superpowers’ to focus on high-value intellectual contributions.
Schleifer provided a concrete example of how this works in practice: “We’ve had several customers implement what I refer to as just-in-time, contextually relevant information. A sell-side fixed income desk, for example, had this exact requirement. When an order or RFQ comes in, the trader needs to see everything relevant in one place, perhaps summarised with a simple red-amber-green traffic light system. They don’t have time to manually pull up the CRM system, search for historical Indications of Interest (IoIs), check the client’s margin, or look up how much business they do with other desks. All of that information needs to be brought together instantly.”
The Synergy of Interoperability and AI In Practice
Interoperability frameworks, built on standards such as FDC3 and delivered through API-first, containerised architectures, allow applications to interact seamlessly across the desktop. Combined with AI, this creates practical, high-value use cases such as Wealth Management Client Outreach, Trader Blasts, M&A Deal Marketing Emails, and FX Flashcards.
One panellist underscored the potential of AI agents running directly on the trader’s desktop. By orchestrating local applications within existing entitlements and compliance controls, firms can avoid pushing sensitive data to the cloud, making deployment both fast and regulator-friendly.
Schleifer elaborated on this approach, highlighting the security and compliance benefits.
“Just like a human assistant, the AI needs access to the same tools and information that you do. However, in our industry – quite understandably and correctly- firms do not want to push their entire trade history, customer data, and proprietary models into a public cloud to be analysed by a third-party AI like Anthropic or OpenAI. Their compliance departments simply will not allow it. Our approach solves this by using interoperability to run the AI agent locally on the desktop, acting as the user. Because you are already logged into your Bloomberg terminal and your EMS, the agent operates with your specific entitlements and data access. Everything stays local on your desktop and is monitored for compliance in exactly the same way as if you were typing at the keyboard.”
He continued: “This allows the AI agent to start doing some of this junior administrative work for you. This is where the real power of combining interoperability and AI in capital markets lies. You don’t need a model that has been trained on all your historical trade data, because the agent can simply connect to your EMS to look at trade executions on your behalf. This makes deploying AI in capital markets fast, safe, and inexpensive.”
Reshaping the Trading Desk: Skills and Strategy
Technology will also reshape trader skillsets. The trader of the future will act less as a system operator and more as an instruction-giver, working with AI co-pilots, embedded chatbots, and contextual tools to design and direct workflows. The metaphor of the desktop as a ‘base plate’ (interoperability platform) on which traders can build customised ‘Legos’ (individual workflows), captured this shift well.
Poll results reinforced the priority: integrating third-party and internal apps into unified workspaces, automating repetitive tasks, and embedding AI tools to assist decision-making were ranked highest for the next 12–18 months.
Measuring Impact and Overcoming Non-Technical Barriers
Measuring ROI requires going beyond cost savings to focus on KPIs that matter, such as more proactive client outreach, improved RFQ response rates, increased AUM, or higher trade volumes. The objective is to offload low-value tasks, reduce cognitive load, and reallocate trader attention to strategic initiatives.
But technology alone is not enough. Organisational silos, cultural resistance, and data governance remain significant barriers. Addressing job-security concerns is essential; as one panellist stressed, the aim is “not getting rid of traders, but instead making them superhuman.” Deploying solutions permissionlessly at the desktop level, i.e. without heavy IT intervention, can also accelerate adoption and innovation.
In conclusion, the road to an optimised trader desktop is pragmatic, not revolutionary. For firms of all sizes, the starting point is the same, observed Schleifer. “When people ask about the first practical steps for firms with limited resources, my advice is the same for them as it is for the large ones. You must start by identifying a business initiative where the organisation faces a challenge, like the need to do more with less. Pinpoint exactly what you are trying to do more of, and then look at where your resources are limited.”
When automation is tied to measurable business outcomes, and when culture shifts to view technology as an enabler of human potential, the result is more than efficiency. It is sustainable competitive advantage, empowering traders to do what only they can do: apply their intellect, insight, and judgement in the markets.
Subscribe to our newsletter
