About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

New Research Points to Systemic Failure of Spreadsheet Risk Management Within UK Organisations

Subscribe to our newsletter

A new survey* from ClusterSeven, an international provider of strategic spreadsheet and data management software, shows that 56.5% of spreadsheet users have never received formal training on the spreadsheet package they use. Worryingly, 47% have never even been offered spreadsheet training.

Of those surveyed by ClusterSeven, 72% admitted that no internal department checks their spreadsheets for accuracy. Only 12.9% said that Internal Audit reviews their spreadsheets, while a mere 1.1% receive checks from their risk department.

Spreadsheets enable organisations to quickly and flexibly perform analysis that would otherwise be difficult or time consuming, says ClusterSeven. As a result, businesses tend to place undue trust in the integrity of the analysis captured in their spreadsheets.

Ralph Baxter, CEO of ClusterSeven, said: “This research is a clear indication that organisations are systemically failing to properly control the way in which spreadsheets are being used and managed. Over the last number of years, high profile cases have brought spreadsheet usage to the forefront of organisations risk management procedures, but unfortunately governance has yet to catch up.. Organisations need to understand the risks they now face, and not when a serious financial error has arisen.”

Further research by ClusterSeven has shown that 47.2% of users made between one and four errors on their spreadsheets, while 11.6% made between five and 10 errors. Shockingly 6.6% made more than 11 errors following the construction of their spreadsheets.

Ralph Baxter continued: “It is clear that the prospects for serious errors occurring within spreadsheets are very likely, with over 65% of interviewees admitting to making mistakes. This is extremely worrying considering that organisations rely on carrying out business critical data processes using this tool, which some cases involve millions of pounds in transactions.

“Currently no department is charged with reviewing and securing spreadsheets, leaving this process entirely in the hands of the end-user. As our research has shown, this needs to change, with one department charged with maintaining policy for the review and security of all business critical spreadsheet usage. This can be carried out cheaply and effectively with the tools readily available, coupled with user training and individual risk assessment of spreadsheets.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: End-to-End Lineage for Financial Services: The Missing Link for Both Compliance and AI Readiness

The importance of complete robust end-to-end data lineage in financial services and capital markets cannot be overstated. Without the ability to trace and verify data across its lifecycle, many critical workflows – from trade reconciliation to risk management – cannot be executed effectively. At the top of the list is regulatory compliance. Regulators demand a...

BLOG

A-Team Launches Inaugural AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Artificial intelligence-led applications offer financial institutions the potential to do more with their data at a time when increasingly complex economic and geopolitical influences place extraordinary operational pressures on them. The technology is now being applied to all parts of an organisation, from asset and risk management to customer relationship management and regulatory compliance. A...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – A Solution for Entity Data?

The Global LEI System – or GLEIS – has been in development since the middle of last year. Development has been patchy at times, but much has been done, leaving fewer outstanding issues, but also raising new questions. What’s emerging is a structure for the GLEIS going forward, complete with a mechanism for registering and...