About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

New JWG Study Shows Firms Slow to Respond to Risk Data Management Requirements

Subscribe to our newsletter

Research launched by JWG today finds that global financial services organisations are not actively reviewing their risk data quality processes following the fall-out of the financial crisis. The study, which includes responses from 20 risk, data, and finance professionals in 16 global firms, shows that, while risk data quality is a pertinent issue, little has changed in the way risk data is managed. This ‘business as usual’ mindset should come as a worrying symptom to firms’ senior management in the face of increased regulatory scrutiny of risk data.

The survey has found that:

? The industry has woken up to the importance of risk data management: 100% of respondents believe that risk data quality is at least an ‘important’ issue.

? However, regulatory pressure has not yet catalysed action: fewer than half of those surveyed say that their firm’s business and risks are aligned.

? Only 22% of those surveyed strongly agree that their respective firms have assigned adequate resources and personnel to risk management improvement programmes.

? Most firms believe that the benefits of improving risk management information (MI) are primarily soft, and the drivers are internal as opposed to regulatory.

It is clear that firms are taking a cautious approach to a complex and costly issue and they have not set the bar very high when it comes to new targets. Further, there is a lack of board-level clarity as to how to achieve these targets.

Despite this laissez-faire attitude, there are some early examples of plans for long-term infrastructure change projects. Large firms have the most work ahead of them as they are faced with the challenge of developing risk management data sets spread across multiple, disparate businesses.

According to JWG CEO, PJ Di Giammarino, “The big question is to what extent regulators will define and enforce meaningful risk data policy. If the past is any indication, it is by no means certain that they will at all. If they do, however, it is reason enough for boards to be worried.

”We are currently in an 18-month regulatory window in which the industry has a chance to set things right, with Basel III and Solvency II just around the corner. If the industry misses its chance and gets this wrong, there could be severe consequences. Firms could be mandated to increase capital buffers, and more capital tied up would affect the price of credit, the availability of mortgages and loans to homeowners and businesses.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Detecting and preventing market abuse

Market abuse – unlawful disclosure of inside information, insider trading, circular trading, “pump and dump” schemes, etc. – poses significant threats to the integrity of capital markets. In 2024, global trading house Trafigura agreed to pay a $55 million fine to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for trading with non-public information, manipulating a...

BLOG

Recently Updated Private-Market Data and Technology Offerings

Capital-market volatility, squeezed margins and geopolitical tensions are encouraging asset managers to look more broadly across asset classes to spread risk and increase returns. Private markets and other alternative assets have been huge beneficiaries of this trend and are likely to continue gaining share of invested capital, with Preqin estimating that investment in private markets...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...