About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Transaction Reporting Requirements Posing Big Problem for Investment Firms

Subscribe to our newsletter

Over 1,000 investment firms identified problems with their MiFID II transaction reporting requirements in 2018, according to regulatory consultancy Bovill – raising questions around how well the industry is really adapting to the complexities of the new regime.

A Freedom of Information request found that a total of 1,335 notifications of inaccurate transaction reporting were submitted to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the first 12 months of MiFID II (which came into force on January 1, 2018) as firms struggle to get to grips with the new requirements.

The figure represents around a quarter of the 6,000 MiFID II compliant UK businesses, and Bovill Managing Consultant Damon Batten notes that it could in fact represent a significant undercount, as the data only includes businesses which self-identified errors. Under the EU directive, investment firms and trading venues are required to notify the FCA promptly if they identify any errors or omissions within their transaction reports. However, Bovill research warns that “many thousands more firms” are likely submitting inaccurate reports, but are failing to catch them or to inform the regulator.

“Even MiFID II-ready firms are struggling to submit correct reports, while many are still not ready, and some mistakenly believe they’re ready despite almost certainly making reporting errors,” says Batten.

So far, the FCA has not yet enforced the regulation with any degree of aggression, and has indicated that it is prepared to give firms time to settle in and adapt to the new regulation. However, its approach has raised ire within the industry, with prominent figures such as SCM Direct Co-Founders Alan and Gina Miller citing “a complete breakdown in the FCA regulatory enforcement action,” and threatening legal action against the regulator for failing to penalise investment managers that are breaking the rules.

Yet there are signs that the FCA’s patience is running out. On March 27, the regulator fined Goldman Sachs over £34 million for failing to properly report more than 220 million transactions. The previous week, UBS was fined £227.6 million over 135.8 erroneous transaction reports made between November 2007 and May 2017.

“With the FCA handing big fines for reporting failings to companies like UBS and Goldman Sachs, it’s time firms paid closer attention,” warns Batten. “The FCA’s goodwill will be thin for firms still unable to catch breaches by MiFID II’s second birthday.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Post-Trade Transformation: Automating Clearing & Settlement

Date: 1 December 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The UK, EU and Swiss markets move to T+1 settlement on 11 October 2027, but the first binding compression arrives almost a year earlier. ESMA’s amended settlement discipline RTS expects allocation and confirmation completed by 23:00 CET on trade...

BLOG

Why Sanctions Compliance Is Becoming an Intelligence-Led Discipline

By Theodora Papadimitropoulou, Head of Global Product Strategy, GTM at Dun & Bradstreet. For years, sanctions compliance was closely associated with a single task, running a counterparty’s name against the relevant lists, checking for a match and acting if required. How much that tells you, though, depends heavily on the provider and the data behind...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...