About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ISDA Publishes 2011 Equity Derivatives Definitions

Subscribe to our newsletter

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) announced today the publication of the 2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions. The Definitions represent a key development in the ongoing industry initiative to increase standardization and automation and further reduce risk across over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.

The Definitions, published on July 8, include a Main Book and an Appendix, and are structured to allow for periodic updating. The Main Book contains the core definitions and provides a menu of provisions that can be combined to create different transactions. The Appendix to the Main Book contains tables setting out possible elections, consequences and fallbacks. The 2011 Definitions are drafted to be principles based, flexible and modular.

“The publication of the 2011 Equity Derivatives Definitions represents an important element in the derivative industry’s commitment to standardize these contracts, increase automation and electronic confirmations and to enhance transparency,” said Eric Litvack, ISDA Board Member, Chair of the ISDA Equity Derivatives Steering Committee and Managing Director, Société Générale. “The Definitions also supply a toolkit that takes into account market developments and provides flexibility for new products to be efficiently documented going forward.”

The 2011 Definitions were developed by four working groups of the 2011 Equity Definitions Drafting Committee, which comprises a global membership with representatives from both buy- and sell-side institutions. The Definitions are part of a new process and structure for documenting equity derivatives that will be implemented incrementally, initially via transaction matrices. In contrast to the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, which were based upon a standard confirmation template for each of the three major transaction types (Swaps, Options, and Forwards), the 2011 Definitions confirmation structure is based upon a universal framework which is designed to support a unique set of core definitions.

Each transaction is a combination of unique terms, built on the same framework and may be documented, matched, and analyzed electronically. As next steps, market participants will create transaction matrices for US Index Variance Swaps and EU Index Variance Swaps by August 31. This will be followed by a review and plan of subsequent matrix products in October 2011.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: ESG data sourcing and management to meet your ESG strategy, objectives and timeline

ESG data plays a key role in research, fund product development, fund selection, asset selection, performance tracking, and client and regulatory reporting, yet it is not always easy to source and manage in a complete, transparent and timely manner. This webinar will review the state-of-play on ESG data, consider the challenges of sourcing and managing...

BLOG

Alexandre Kech Steps Up to Role of GLEIF CEO as Stephan Wolf Steps Down

Following the decision by Stephan Wolf, CEO of the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF), to step down from the role on 24 June 2024 after a decade of leading the foundation from its start-up phase to the growing organisation it is today, the GLEIF board of directors has appointed Alexandre Kech to the position....

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 14th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management, 2010 Edition

The global regulatory community has become increasingly aware of the data management challenge within financial institutions, as it struggles with its own challenge of better tracking systemic risk across financial markets. The US regulator in particular is seemingly keen to kick off a standardisation process and also wants the regulatory community to begin collecting additional...