About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Is There a Place for Non-Independent TCAs in the FX Market?

Subscribe to our newsletter

Amid the ongoing demand for transparency, Eric Huttman, CEO of MillTechFX asks if there is a place for non-independent TCA in today’s FX market.

The foreign exchange (FX) market is notoriously opaque. Today, a large number of firms have no visibility on whether they are getting a good deal from their providers. As a result, many are paying over the odds for their FX needs.

Transaction cost analysis (TCA) was designed to help firms understand how much they are being charged for the execution of their FX transactions.

While banks and other FX providers provide TCA to their clients, in essence, they are reporting on their own fees and auditing their own execution. This raises an important question. Is there a place for non-independent TCA providers in today’s FX market?

The hidden costs of FX

FX costs are typically hidden in the spread. The transaction cost on any given trade can be calculated as the difference between the rate achieved, and the mid-market rate at that point in time.

For example, if a CFO sells US Dollars to buy €5m at 1.1890 and the mid-market rate at the time was 1.1860, the transaction cost on the trade would be 0.25%, or €12,500. This is not an explicit cost as the CFO won’t receive an invoice for this amount; rather, it’s a hidden implicit cost.

For many asset managers and corporates who trade FX for payment or hedging purposes, instead of using TCA, they might instead look to open trading facilities with multiple FX counterparties. The hope is that a more competitive trading environment creates enough price tension that the client doesn’t have to monitor costs.

However, there are two problems with this approach.

It can be highly inefficient to set up and manage multiple FX counterparty relationships, creating an operational overhead throughout the business.

The FX market also provides better rates for bigger customers – a concept called ‘tailored pricing’. As a result, the best rates are reserved for institutions that transact the highest volumes, meaning mid-sized corporates and asset managers often struggle to get the best possible deal.

A 2019 paper from the ECB found that banks were overcharging hedging rates for small corporate customers by as much as 25x higher than their bigger, more sophisticated customers.

To get a view on these hidden costs, asset managers and corporates first must understand how much they are being charged for execution.

Shining a light on hidden costs

Transaction cost analysis (TCA) was created to provide transparency on the hidden costs in FX. It helps firms understand how much they are being charged for the execution of their FX transactions and exposes any costs hidden in the spread.

While TCA has been present in equity markets for some time, it has taken longer to become a staple of the FX market. This is because of the bilateral and decentralised nature of the market, which makes it much more complex to track trades and transactions than the exchange-based markets.

Nevertheless, the use of TCA in FX has grown in recent years, coinciding with a global push to promote transparency in a market that has been dogged by opacity and a lack of trust between providers and participants.

The FX Global Code of Conduct – developed by the Global Foreign Exchange Committee as a way to restore trust – includes the use of TCA reporting.

Providers marking their own homework

A number of firms receive their TCA reporting from FX providers when they are initially vying for their business. However, once the client business is won, many providers stop offering the service and their clients lose sight of their FX costs.

It’s important to note that these TCA providers are not independent. They’re producing reports on their own performance for their clients, so there is no external validation. In essence, providers are marking their own homework.

Furthermore, TCA data from one liquidity provider is unlikely to provide an objective evaluation. So those clients that are lucky enough to receive regular TCA reporting from their banks, are more than likely not getting the full picture.

Time for independent TCA

There are a number of components that now go into calculating TCA that encompass more than simply tracking the cost of execution. For FX, these include fill ratio, price variation, hold time, bid-offer spread and market impact.

With competition and costs rising, the use of TCA to compare both the implicit and explicit costs of multiple liquidity providers and brokers enables firms to lower their own trading costs and reduce their own overheads.

Crucially, it also enables firms to demonstrate good governance to their stakeholders and investors.

It is therefore vital that TCA should come from an independent and verifiable source. Rather than taking TCA data directly from multiple liquidity providers, firms can employ an independent, multi-bank TCA provider.

Significant progress has been made in the effort to bring more transparency to the FX world and TCA has a vital role to play. While there is still further work to do in terms of achieving full transparency at each stage of the execution process, the greater use of independent TCA providers would go some way to ensuring confidence in the integrity of the data.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Recorded Webinar: Market Data in the Cloud: Fuelling the next generation of data delivery solutions

Moving market data and infrastructure to the cloud has accelerated in recent years as financial firms have acknowledged the benefits of data accessibility, scalability, efficiency and the possibility of reducing sometimes sky-high costs of sourcing and managing the data. Market data in the cloud also offers a low-cost development environment and is finding use case...


BMLL Secures Investment and Partnership with Snowflake to Democratise Access to Level 3 Data

BMLL, the independent provider of harmonised, historical Level 3 data and analytics across global equity and futures markets, has announced a strategic investment from Snowflake Ventures. This comes on the heels of a $26 million Series B investment from Nasdaq Ventures, FactSet, and IQ Capital in Q4 2022. The new partnership with Snowflake aims to...


ESG Data & Tech Summit London

The ESG Data & Tech Summit will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.


Institutional Digital Assets Handbook 2023

After initial hesitancy, interest in digital assets from institutional market participants has grown over the past three to four years. Early focus inevitably centred on the market opportunities presented by bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. But this has evolved into a broad acceptance of a potentially meaningful role for digital assets in institutional markets. It’s now...