About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Investment Banks Can’t Afford Not to MIND the Front Office Risk GAP

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Oliver Blower, CEO of VoxSmart.

A phrase heard by so many only to be listened to by so few. “Mind the gap”, synonymous with the mundane morning commuter grind, currently takes on a far greater significance for City traders travelling to work.

Not dissimilar to the cost conundrum facing the rail industry recently, when it comes to plugging gaps between when the trade was executed vs when it was booked, it is fair to say investment banks have been struggling. For too long now, trading desks have fallen foul of Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) requirements to book tickets within 15 minutes of executing their trades. Consequently, investment banks have been left paying in excess of £50 million per annum in fines.

Therefore, in these cost-conscious times, how and why have so many of the biggest financial institutions found themselves in this situation? The answer to this question lies in the daily interactions that take place between traders. As a case in point, a trader at say Morgan Stanley may well call up a counterparty at Citi to buy half a yard of dollar/yen, before then heading down the pub and subsequently forgetting to book the trade for three days. While the Citi trader may have booked the trade, the Morgan Stanley risk department has no clue because their trader is already three pints in down the Red Lion. The point is that no investment bank throughout this year can afford to be in a position where they are brushing this issue under the sticky pub carpet.

After years of seeing the PRA fines as a necessary evil, banks know they need to have a better grasp of their cost base. Today, a head of desks profit and loss (P&L) is coming under intense scrutiny from the business to reduce gross revenues to net revenues where possible. As a result, the days of absorbing these costs are long gone. From FX and rate to credit and equity derivatives, every single desk is under the microscope right now. The numbers that banks can recuperate from fines are now in the tens of millions – which is a significant percentage of any desks P&L.

The good news is that investment banks can turn to tech to close the front office risk gap. Certain firms are already deploying tools that enable them to become much more efficient in terms of their execution and booking capabilities. Ultimately, if banks are going to thrive in these bottom line conscious and compliance heavy times, identifying pivotal issues surrounding trade booking and execution times is one major way to shave a few million off the cost base.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining infrastructure can take months and absorb significant budget before a single model is tested. At the...

BLOG

When Margin Moves Upstream: How TT is Reworking Trading Decisions After the OpenGamma Deal

More than a month after completing its acquisition of OpenGamma, Trading Technologies is beginning to articulate how the deal is intended to change the way firms think about margin, capital efficiency, and trading decision-making. Rather than positioning margin as a downstream risk or treasury concern, TT is now framing capital efficiency as a front-office variable...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Spring, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 9th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...