About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Instrument and Entity Identification are Key Issues for MiFID Forum’s Transaction Reporting Subject Group

Subscribe to our newsletter

Given the high profile fines that have been handed out over the last 12 months in the UK for data related transaction reporting failures, it is no surprise that the subject of entity and instrument identification is top of the list for the recently formed Transaction Reporting Subject Group of the MiFID Forum. Alan Jenkins, who was previously head of MiFID at BearingPoint but now is an independent consultant, is chair of the recently formed subject group and led discussions at the group’s inaugural meeting this week, which discussed the potential data requirements of transaction reporting under MiFID mark two.

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has been especially vocal about the data challenges of MiFID, particularly those around entity identification, and has demonstrated an appetite for more regular reviews of the data integrity of transaction reports. To this end, in July, the regulator produced more guidelines about what it is looking for from the firms in these reports via the option for firms to request sample reports. The meeting earlier this week therefore saw elaboration on this point by Dario Crispini, manager of the Transaction Reporting Unit of the FSA, who also highlighted that the regulator is keen for firms to use Bank Identifier Codes (BICs) for client and counterparty identification whenever possible.

The regulator is also considering the use of UK company registration numbers for client and counterparty identification purposes, when a BIC is not available, according to Crispini. Moreover, in terms of formatting, the FSA indicates that BIC codes should be 11 characters long, rather than eight, in order for the regulator’s system to be able to process the data. Under current regulation, all MiFID investment firms need to obtain a BIC to allow for the tracking of data cross border in the European Economic Area. After obtaining a BIC, firms must then email the Transaction Monitoring Unit with their BIC and FRN details in order for the regulator to map the FRN to the respective BIC in its systems. When transaction reporting, firms may continue to populate the reporting firm field with their FRN, however, they need to ensure the FSA’s Transaction Monitoring Unit is aware of the BIC as well.

The group also discussed the use of International Securities Identification Numbers (ISINs) for instrument identification purposes within transaction reports. It was noted that the current European Commission investigation into Standard & Poor’s Cusip Global Services (CGS) business’ charging practices for ISINs in the US market, which has still yet to be concluded, is causing some challenges and concerns for market participants.

In November last year, the Commission indicated that it considers the vendor to be “abusing its dominant position” as the sole appointed National Numbering Agency (NNA) for US securities by requiring its European customers to pay licensing fees for the use of ISINs in their own databases. CGS has since responded by “strongly disagreeing” with the ruling, but is awaiting further action to be taken by the Commission, along with the rest of the market.

With regards to instrument identification, the group discussed the use of the Alternative Instrument Identifier (AII) for transaction reports across Europe for derivatives admitted to trading on regulated markets where the ISO 6166 ISIN is not the industry method of identification. The launch of the FSA’s AII system has been beset by difficulties and has therefore been several times delayed, and the regulator has still yet to confirm the regulatory go live for the AII (see the FSA website section here).

There was also talk about the need for multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) to publish a list of all the reportable instruments not listed on other venues for transaction reporting purposes. Attendees and speakers noted the lack of a centralised place for this instrument data.

The MiFID Forum, which is the new incarnation of the MiFID JWG, is due to have its next full meeting at the end of this week and Jenkins is set to take the floor again to summarise some of these issues (see here for more details).

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Taking a holistic approach to buy-side data management

Date: 7 February 2023 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes As data volumes and complexity continue to increase, buy-side data management is at an inflection point. Manual processes and data siloes are no longer fit for purpose, and firms need to take a more holistic approach to data management...

BLOG

Optimising High Performance Infrastructure for Growing Market Data Volumes

As market data volumes continue to grow, firms across the industry – both market participants and their service providers – are having to think strategically about what kind of infrastructure they need in order to accommodate this growth, particularly under peak loads, whilst optimising for high performance. Given the rising volume, what kind of decisions...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 12th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry, to explore how trading firms are innovating in today’s cloud and digital based environment to create flexible, scalable trading platforms to support speed to market and business agility.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2022/2023 – Tenth Edition

Welcome to the tenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication that has tracked new regulations, amendments, implementation and data management requirements as regulatory change has impacted global capital markets participants over the past 10 years. This edition of the handbook includes new regulations and highlights some of the major regulatory interventions challenging...