About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

How Buying Fixnetix Is Truly a Risky Business

Subscribe to our newsletter

Hot on the heels of Colt’s protracted courtship of MarketPrizm comes yet another corporate action in our beloved low-latency infrastructure segment. This one caught us by surprise, but not because it was unexpected. It’s been expected for so long that we’d forgotten about it, to be honest.

That Fixnetix was ‘for sale’ has been a part of normal life since – I don’t know – since when many of us first heard of the company; that and the longstanding perception that the company is nothing more than a Wombat reseller.

Clearly the latter can’t be the case, as Fixnetix has found a buyer. And this is where the surprise comes in.

Yes, it’s Markit.

No, seriously. It’s Markit. The company that just bought QuIC, the risk management people, is set to sign on the dotted line for Fixnetix, a provider of low-latency connectivity services.

I’m not sure I get it yet, either. But I have a hunch what this is about, and it’s all about risk.

Smarting – for quite some time – about this market perception as a pure infrastructure play, Fixnetix has been working hard to add value-added services to its offerings. You may recall that it quashed the Wombat perception with the acquisition of Market Systems Technology, an old-school ticker plant developer that once built an equities data feed business for Telerate no less.

And yet we continued to be scolded for referring to the company has a high-end market data distribution platform that was highly successful in helping prime brokers offer technology services to their hedge fund clients. There was more – so much more – to the offering. And this, it seems to me, is the risk bit.

For high in the hierarchy of what Fixnetix has brought to the table is a set of pre-trade risk management capabilities that help clients operate in the high-speed multi-venue marketplace. Think FTEN, Mantara and the like. And as our trusty readers will know, this is a very hot item, what with SEC Rule 15c-3-5 and whatnot.

So, our theory is that Markit is on a roll to construct a risk workflow suite of offerings, with QuIC at its core, its own valuations and other risk-related information supplementing, and now Fixnetix completing the pre-trade risk circle.

Now, we’ve been wrong before. But we don’t think we are on this one.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unlocking value: Harnessing modern data platforms for data integration, advanced investment analytics, visualisation and reporting

Modern data platforms are bringing efficiencies, scalability and powerful new capabilities to institutions and their data pipelines. They are enabling the use of new automation and analytical technologies that are also helping firms to derive more value from their data and reduce costs. Use cases of specific importance to the finance sector, such as data...

BLOG

FIX Trading Community Unveils Reforms to Boost European Markets

The FIX Trading Community has put forward a series of proposals aimed at enhancing the transparency and appeal of European capital markets. In a whitepaper titled “FIXing Europe – How the European Consolidated Tape can radically improve the image of European capital markets,” the industry association outlines four key reforms to address long-standing issues with...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Hosted/Managed Services

The on-site data management model is broken. Resources have been squeezed to breaking point. The industry needs a new operating model if it is truly to do more with less. Can hosted/managed services provide the answer? Can the marketplace really create and maintain a utility-based approach to reference data management? And if so, how can...