About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Getting Sidetracked on the Topic of MiFID

Subscribe to our newsletter

This week’s MiFID Forum debate was a case in point of how easy it is to go off track when discussing the current barrage of consultation papers released related to the MiFID review. Although some of the discussions were interesting from a bigger picture perspective, I expect that much more productive talks will take place when the group has been broken down into targeted subject matter expert groups.

David Doyle, EU policy advisor in financial services, provided attendees with a bit of scene setting with regards to the next incarnation of MiFID, including drawing attention to its connectivity to the Market Abuse Directive (MAD – the best regulatory acronym out there) update and the European Commission’s Packaged Retail Investment Products (PRIPs) proposals. He warned that far from representing a “routine check up”, the MiFID review process is likely to result in a whole host of new and stringent requirements aimed at increasing investor protection.

Doyle also suggested that industry participants pay close attention to what is happening across the pond in the US, as the desire for a degree of alignment between the US and Europe has been frequently articulated in Brussels.

Given the status of most of the information that has thus far been issued by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) and the Commission itself around MiFID, it is no surprise that there was a degree of detail lacking in the overall discussions at the event. The proposals are all at the consultancy stage, after all.

However, enough information has been issued (even if it is not definitive) for a serious debate to be had about the post-trade data requirements and what they may mean for firms if they are passed as a directive or direct regulation. There was brief discussion of the proposed client classification regime changes, but aside from noting that there is a lack of clarity, there was little time for in depth discussion about what these may mean going forward.

The panel debate got snared up in a discussion about why the European Parliament is interested in the space in the first place, which while quite entertaining, didn’t elicit anything in the way of practical advice or constructive criticism.

Hopefully the next event will have a more focused and structured approach. After all, every speaker was keen to provide feedback to the regulatory community and that requires constructive dialogue and recommendations.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Hearing from the Experts: AI Governance Best Practices

9 September 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes The rapid spread of artificial intelligence in the financial industry presents data teams with novel challenges. AI’s ability to harvest and utilize vast amounts of data has raised concerns about the privacy and security of sensitive proprietary data and the ethical...

BLOG

Regulators Stay Tough: Why Surveillance Matters in 2025

By Paul Cottee, Director, Regulatory Compliance, NICE Actimize. A common question has arisen in recent conversations and at conferences. Now that major U.S. regulators have new leaders and enforcement heads in place, will enforcement actions slow down both in the United States and around the world? In other words, can financial institutions ease surveillance efforts? ...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...