About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Fitch Releases Global Money Market Fund Rating Criteria

Subscribe to our newsletter

Fitch today released updated rating criteria for money market funds, with particular emphasis on funds that invest in short term debt instruments issued by financial institutions, non-financial corporations and asset backed commercial paper programmes (often referred to as ‘prime’ funds).

Prime money market funds were central to the financial crisis last year following the failure of the Reserve Primary Fund, which in turn led to unprecedented redemption activity at a number of other prime funds. The updated criteria apply globally to both constant as well as variable net asset value money market funds (CNAV and VNAV, respectively).

The publication of Fitch’s revised criteria coincides with recent proposals to enhance the regulatory framework for money market funds put forth by various regulators, notably the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and certain industry trade associations. In several important areas, the changes under consideration by the SEC and the industry closely mirror Fitch’s criteria, which were initially proposed earlier this year.

The objectives underpinning the proposals from the SEC and the industry serve to strengthen the money market fund industry and, when adopted, will provide a common framework for managing money market funds in the US. Moreover, certain non-US domiciled funds also are expected to substantially mirror these new rules in support of a global standard for CNAV money market funds.

Key proposed regulatory enhancements to the way money market funds will operate include: more conservative credit quality and liquidity guidelines; introduction of a weighted average final maturity of 120 days to better capture spread risk and bolster overall portfolio liquidity (termed WAMF by Fitch); minimum daily and weekly portfolio liquidity, as a percent of assets, to protect against stressed redemption levels; recognition of counterparty risk in repurchase agreements; and streamlined process of sponsor support, if needed.

In order to for funds to be assigned ‘AAA-mmf’ ratings there are a number of elements of Fitch’s criteria that are above and beyond those proposed by regulators and the industry.

Key elements of Fitch’s new criteria include: a new rating scale (AAAmmf) and definitions that are intended to provide improved transparency and differentiation; the measurement of overall portfolio risk along two dimensions – credit quality and maturity (termed the Portfolio Credit Factor or PCF matrix); an analysis of fund diversification that considers direct and indirect credit risk exposures; overnight and weekly portfolio liquidity analysis to determine a fund’s shareholder profile and concentrations in addition to fixed percentages; a review of guidelines designed to reduce the risk from securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements and other leveraged activities; an evaluation of the fund sponsor’s multi-faceted role, including: investment management; risk oversight; governance; administration; and financial support, if needed, in times of extreme stress.

The minimum standards established under the enhanced regulatory framework are viewed as being consistent with risk in the ‘Ammf’ to ‘AAmmf’ range on Fitch’s new scale. In reality, however, most funds operate with tighter guidelines than those allowed under regulatory and industry proposals and are also sponsored by larger, financially-sound entities. As a result, Fitch expects that the majority of funds it currently rates will qualify for ‘AAAmmf’ ratings under Fitch’s new criteria.

Some funds, however, may elect to operate with guidelines that are outside of the ‘AAAmmf’ criteria or may be sponsored by entities that are viewed by Fitch as lacking sufficient resources and/or an established track record in the investment management industry. Such funds may no longer fall within Fitch’s ‘AAAmmf’ ratings guidelines. Fitch will provide a 90-day implementation window in order for funds to adapt to the changes in Fitch’s new criteria and allow for conversion to the new scale.

Fitch notes that the structure of money market funds and the degree of systemic risk that the industry poses continues to be debated. In the US, the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets is studying the issue and is expected to publish its recommendations in December.

Similarly, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) recently began a work programme with the goal of establishing Europe-wide criteria for collective investment schemes wishing to be classified as “euro money market” funds. Industry groups also continue to consider whether additional, longer term changes are warranted. Fitch will monitor these developments, providing commentary and adjusting its ratings methodology as appropriate.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practice approaches to trade surveillance for market abuse

Breaches of market abuse regulation can lead to reputational damage, eye-watering fines and, ultimately, custodial sentences of up to 10 years. Internally, market abuse triggers scrutiny of traders and trading behaviours; externally it can undermine confidence in markets and cause financial instability. This webinar will discuss market abuse of different types, such as insider trading...

BLOG

Solidatus Joins AWS Marketplace

Solidatus has joined the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Marketplace to bring connected data governance to AWS customers. With integrations to AWS services such as S3 and Redshift, and partnerships and integrations with data management vendors including Collibra, Snowflake, Alteryx, Google BigQuery, BigID, Denodo, Informatica, Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM Redhat, Solidatus can deliver an integrated data...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Impact of Derivatives on Reference Data Management

They may be complex and burdened with a bad reputation at the moment, but derivatives are here to stay. Although Bank for International Settlements figures indicate that derivatives trading is down for the first time in 10 years, the asset class has been strongly defended by the banking and brokerage community over the last few...