About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Financial Institutions Delusional on Quality of Regulatory Reports, ACA Study Finds

Subscribe to our newsletter

Despite finding that 87% of firms are confident in the quality of their MiFIR and/or EMIR reports, research commissioned by ACA Group has discovered that 97% of reports submitted to regulators via Approved Reporting Mechanisms (ARMs) and Trade Repositories contain inaccuracies. The research found reporting data quality to be poor, with each report containing an average of 30 separate error types.

The issues around regulatory reporting were discussed extensively last week on two panels at A-Team Group’s RegTech Summit Virtual, recordings of which are still available to watch here.

The first panel – ‘Re-imagining the regulatory reporting framework to reduce the cost of compliance’ – explored how global regulators like ESMA, ASIC and CFTC are seeking to align regulatory reporting requirements, with a view to unlocking potential efficiencies and easing complexity. Panellists included a mix of practitioners, industry service providers and technology suppliers, including: Robin Doyle, MD, Regulatory Affairs, JP Morgan; Chad Giussani, Head of Transaction Reporting, Compliance, Standard Chartered; Malavika Solanki, Member of the Management Team, Derivatives Service Bureau; Tom Wieczorek, MD Global Product Management UnaVista, an LSEG business; and Matt Smith, CEO, SteelEye.

The second panel – ‘European regulatory reporting post Brexit – managing MiFIR, EMIR & SFTR’ – exploring best practices and lessons learned for complying with MiFIR, EMIR & SFTR reporting regimes in the post-Brexit environment. The panel looked at how firms are dealing with managing UK and EU dual reporting requirements, and offered insights into leveraging RegTech and building best practice into regulatory reporting processes and platforms. The panel comprised Melanie Bristow, Director – SFTR & EMIR Refit Programme, UBS;  Philip Flood, Business Development Director, Regulatory & STP Services, Gresham Technologies; Nicklas Nilsson, Regulatory Specialist, Compliance Solutions Strategies (CSS); and Matthew Chapman, Managing Director and Co-Lead of ACA’s Regulatory Reporting & Assurance (ARRMA) service, ACA Group.

The ACA report said that with almost 90% of firms confident in the quality of their reporting data, many assumed their reports were fine since they had received no direct contact from the FCA. But with reports containing over 30 error types, the report said, “this is not just a case of a single mistake affecting all reports – it is a potential indication of widespread misunderstanding of how certain reporting requirements apply to firms and their activities, particularly when arrangements and activities change.”

Transaction reporting plays a fundamental role in market abuse surveillance and regulatory attention on data quality and timeliness is expected to increase in 2021 and beyond. The data shows that, even 12 months on from the EMIR REFIT, data quality is still poor as firms struggle to implement best practise, fully identify how reporting fields need to be populated differently to reflect different trading scenarios, identify and correct errors and collaborate effectively with third parties delivering their reporting.

According to ACA’s Chapman, “There is clearly a gap between perception and reality when it comes to transaction reporting. Nearly 87% of respondents in our recent survey said they were confident their transaction reporting is 100% accurate and timely. Yet, our analysis shows that it is highly likely the reports in question would have contained errors.

Chapman reckons the issue is likely to come to a head soon: “Getting trade and transaction reporting right is going to continue to grow in importance over the next 24 months. Regulators have repeatedly described complete and accurate reporting as a common good as well as their growing frustrations that firms aren’t getting it right. As a result, they are making no bones about the fact that they expect prompt and significant improvement. Although lack of public enforcement action in relation to MiFIR and EMIR reporting may have lulled some firms into a false sense of security, they must be prepared for this to change in the months ahead, or face the consequences.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Hearing from the Experts: AI Governance Best Practices

9 September 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes The rapid spread of artificial intelligence in the financial industry presents data teams with novel challenges. AI’s ability to harvest and utilize vast amounts of data has raised concerns about the privacy and security of sensitive proprietary data and the ethical...

BLOG

“No WhatsApp Ban” – FCA’s Transition from Prescriptive Rulemaking to Outcome-Focused Regulation

There was a flurry of headlines recently following statements from Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Chief Executive Nikhil Rathi on a podcast, where he laid out the FCA’s new five-year strategy and its mandate for growth. In response to a direct question about regulating encrypted messaging apps and WhatsApp specifically, Mr. Rathi stated that they’re not...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit New York

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...