About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Final Thoughts on Sifma, Past and Present

Subscribe to our newsletter

The first SIA (now Sifma) show I attended was in 1986. In some ways, it was quite different to the event last week, while in other ways it was pretty much the same.

Entering the main show floor in 1986, one would be confronted by the big Quotron booth, with sales head George Levine in residence. Quotron, and of course its prime position at the show, was acquired by Reuters a few years back (well, actually I think parent Citigroup paid them to take it off their balance sheet). But George remains a fixture on the booth, and that’s reasuring for many of us.

George can probably remember what it was like in the financial technology world of the mid 1980s better than I can. It was a frothy time, not unlike today, with deregulation leading to massive investment in trading systems. Now, it’s regulatation that’s driving a lot of that investment. Financial tech vendors always find opportunities to sell.

I have certain recollections of the show floor back then. Imnet – a joint venture between Merrill Lynch and IBM – was present. That initiative went belly up a little while later, and many pointed out that the notion of a sell-side firm being in the technology business was just plain daft. Daft it may be, but these days, the sell side can’t get enough of firms offering order routing and algo trading technology – now seen as important components of strategies to win order flow.

I also remember vendors like Micrognosis, FD Consulting, CP Technology, Bishopsgate, Program-IT and many others all competing in the digital and video trading room market data distribution business, in which Reuters and its Triarch system was probably the leader in terms of sales, if not quite in terms of technology. Just about all of those vendors got acquired, went bust and dropped out of the trading room marketplace, as Reuters got a stranglehold on it, most recently with its RMDS offering.

So it’s with a significant sense of deja-vu that this time I observed companies like Activ Financial, Wombat, 29 West, Infodyne, QuantHouse, and Reuters of course, all competing in the new-ish market for low latency architectures. What’s going to become of all these players? Well, if I were a betting man, I’d try to learn from history.

Until next time … here’s some good music.

[tags]sifma,reuters,quotron,imnet,micrognosis,wombat,29 west,activ,infodyne,quant house[/tags]

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Smart Trader Desktops: Placing UX at the front and centre of the trading workflow

Trading strategy is in place, the technology stack is optimised and the trading team is highly skilled – but what about the user experience? Whatever the stack, the desktop, the trading apps and their functionality, a trading platform is only as good as its user interface (UI) and user experience (UX). This webinar will review...

BLOG

Sequitor Partners with LSEG to Offer Simulation Service Using LSEG PCAP Data

Sequitor Engineering, the simulation service provider for electronic financial markets, has formed a partnership with the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) to jointly offer its simulation services alongside LSEG’s PCAP (packet capture) data. This collaboration enables Sequitor’s clients to run highly realistic simulations using native wire-format market tick data, captured directly at LSEG’s exchange data...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Institutional Digital Assets Handbook 2024

Despite the setback of the FTX collapse, institutional interest in digital assets has grown markedly in the past 12 months, with firms of all sizes now acknowledging participation in some form. While as recently as a year ago, institutional trading firms were taking a cautious stance toward their use, the acceptance of tokenisation, stablecoins, and...