About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Fenergo Study Reveals True Cost of KYC

Subscribe to our newsletter

A global study of more than 1,000 C-level executives across corporate and institutional banks, published by client-onboarding specialist Fenergo, offers a view on how much of a burden KYC represents for many institutions.

Financial institutions are spending millions of dollars every year inefficiently onboarding and maintaining clients, according to the research. The survey, conducted in August this year, found that almost 30% of firms are dedicating between 31% and 40% of their entire compliance budget to meeting their KYC obligations.

This is reflected by the number of full-time employees dedicated to KYC-related activities, which totalled between 2,000 and 2,500 staff for 21% of firms surveyed, between 1,500 and 2,000 for 31% of firms, and between 500 and 1,000 for 12% of survey respondents. Overall, more than 80% of respondents have between 1,000 and 2,500 employees working on KYC tasks.

The survey found that, on average, over half are spending between $1,500 and $3,000 to complete just one client KYC review. More than 10% of respondents said they were spending $3,000 to $3,500, 15% were spending $2,500 to $3,000, 19% were spending $2,000 to $2,500, and 20% were spending $1,500 to $2,000.

The findings also showed that over half of financial institutions are spending between 61 and 150 days on KYC reviews for clients, with 8% spending 150 to 210 days on the task.

Much of that time is spent gathering and inputting data across multiple systems. Some 90% of respondents said labour-intensive KYC impacts their ability to make better risk decisions. However, the data also shows that financial institutions are now focusing investment on automation with 62% prioritising spend for technology.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How are you managing the need to demonstrate trade reconstruction?

Best execution under MiFID II and other current regulations presents practitioners with a daunting challenge: How does my firm provide evidence that it acted in the best interests of the client? The response necessarily requires storage of vast quantities of data from multiple sources and communications channels, for long periods of time – in the...

BLOG

What an Actimize Sale Might Mean for Surveillance and FinCrime Technology

When news emerged that NICE is preparing to sell its Actimize division – long regarded as one of the most established full-stack platforms for financial crime, fraud, and surveillance – the immediate headlines focused on valuation. With reports suggesting a price in the range of US$1.5–2 billion, the deal would be one of the RegTech...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, London, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 8th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm

It’s hard to believe that as early as the 2009 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh the industry had recognised the need for greater transparency as part of a wider package of reforms aimed at mitigating the systemic risk posed by the OTC derivatives market. That realisation ultimately led to the Dodd Frank Act, and...