About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FASB to Vote on Controversial Fair Value Proposals on 2 April

Subscribe to our newsletter

Following the heavy criticism that has been levelled at the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for its failure to act on issues with fair value accounting standards, the industry body has indicated that it is now preparing for the final vote on its proposals, which were announced on 16 March. The FASB will be carrying out the vote on 2 April and they are then due to come into force for financial statements released at the end of the first quarter.

The new rules will allow firms “significant judgement” in the valuation of their assets and are considered to be a major step away from the original mark to market guidelines. It is expected that the relaxation of the accounting rules will result in an increase in banks’ profits of up to 20% due the reduction in the writedowns on their balance sheets. These financial institutions can now use internal models instead of market prices to value their hard to value assets.

FASB was forced to revise its mark to market legislation following pressure from lobbying efforts by the US Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association (ABA) and the larger financial institutions. Moreover, on 12 March, the FASB was threatened with government action during a hearing of a House Financial Services subcommittee. Government officials told Robert Herz, chairman of the FASB, to get the rule changes implemented in a period of three weeks or face regulatory intervention.

The revisions have also come under criticism for their perceived lack of transparency and the manner in which the FASB was forced to back down by lobbyists and politicians. However, the accounting body has defended its actions and spokesman Neal McGarity has recently stated that it merely expedited the rule changes rather than bowing to pressure in terms of the content of the changes themselves.

It is also feared that the new rules will interfere with US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to remove distressed assets from bank balance sheets by discouraging financial institutions from disposing of these assets.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: End-to-End Lineage for Financial Services: The Missing Link for Both Compliance and AI Readiness

The importance of complete robust end-to-end data lineage in financial services and capital markets cannot be overstated. Without the ability to trace and verify data across its lifecycle, many critical workflows – from trade reconciliation to risk management – cannot be executed effectively. At the top of the list is regulatory compliance. Regulators demand a...

BLOG

CGS Focuses on Hard-Won Privates Expertise Amid Buzz of Startups

CUSIP Global Services is leveraging its history of servicing syndicated loans, asset-backed securities, options, derivatives and other complex asset classes as it expands into the growing private credit and alternatives space. The Norwalk, Connecticut-headquartered provider of issuer and asset identifiers is working closely with financial digital platform FactSet, the Loan Syndication and Trading Association (LSTA)...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Data Lineage Handbook

Data lineage has become a critical concern for data managers in capital markets as it is key to both regulatory compliance and business opportunity. The regulatory requirement for data lineage kicked in with BCBS 239 in 2016 and has since been extended to many other regulations that oblige firms to provide transparency and a data...