About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Exclusive: A Preview of Benchmarks for Tibco’s FTL 1.1

Subscribe to our newsletter

Las Vegas is the destination this week for many Tibco users attending its annual Tucon event. The highlight for many might well be a show by 90s rockers Train at the big party on Wednesday night. But for all of us in the low-latency world, the focus will be on Tuesday’s keynote, when benchmarks for the recently released version 1.1 of FTL messaging will be announced. And here’s a little preview …

The bottom line is that compared to its 1.0 release, the 1.1 offering provides a big latency reduction for both intra-server and inter-server communications.

For intra-server, latency is reduced from 384 nanoseconds to 318. For inter-server using InfiniBand and RDMA, it’s down from 3.1 microseconds to 2.2. Both those numbers relate to marketing-friendly 16 byte payloads.

But for more realistic financial markets payloads, the numbers are still pretty good. For example, benchmarking 128 byte payloads, intra-server messaging is 354 nanoseconds, while InfiniBand RDMA is 3.4 microseconds, and 10gE RDMA is 4.14 microseconds.

For its 1.1 benchmarks, Tibco used a dual socket HP DL 380 server, with Intel Xeon 5687 chips, clocked at 3.6GHz. That compares to the 1.0 benchmarks run on a dual-socket Dell C6100 server, with Xeon 5670 chips running at 2.93 GHz.

But according to Tibco’s senior product architect for messaging Bill McLane, the server platfom had little impact on the improved performance. The work done by Tibco itself, particularly on optimising the code paths of the messaging APIs and on network transports, led to most of the latency improvement.

Also new in 1.1 is a graphical interface for FTL’s Realm server, used to design and administer an entire FTL environment.

At Tucon, Tibco will also provide some details of FTL 2.0, which will focus on improved performance and better administration tools to accelerate real life deployments. It is slated for release before year end.

Tibco execs aren’t yet naming any customers for FTL, though a case study at Tucon featuring the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Intel gives one pointer in that respect.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

Modular vs Extensible Modular: Choosing Technology for Prediction Markets

By Daniel Davis, Chief Revenue Officer, Connamara Technologies. Ask most people how a new trading venue should approach its technology, and the answer comes back as a binary: build it yourself, or buy something off the shelf. Build, and you own everything, but you spend years getting to your first trade. Buy, and you launch...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 10th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

The Trading Regulations Handbook

Need to know all the essentials about the regulations impacting trading infrastructure? Welcome to the first edition of our A-Team Trading Regulations Handbook which provides all the essentials about regulations impacting trading operations, data and technology. A-Team’s Trading Regulations Handbook is a great way to see at-a-glance: All the regulations that are impacting trading technology...