About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ESMA Yet Again Postpones CSDR Settlement Discipline

Subscribe to our newsletter

In the wake of the UK’s Chancellor Rishi Sunak rejecting the EU’s Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) settlement discipline regime as part of its adoption of EU regulations post-Brexit, it looks as if the European regulator too is now having second thoughts. Last week, ESMA published a final report on the draft technical standards of the regulation, which definitely postponed the settlement disciple’s entry into force until at least February 2022.

According to the regulator, the delay is due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of regulatory projects and IT deliveries by Central Securities Depositaries and a wide range of market participants, and follows a request from the European Commission (EC). It is the second such postponement, with the regime already pushed back to February 2021 from an original due date of 13 September, 2020.

The standard on settlement discipline covers measures to prevent and address settlement fails, including rules for the trade allocation and confirmation process, cash penalties on failed transactions, mandatory buy-ins, and the monitoring and reporting of settlement fails. It has long been a controversial element of the CSDR, and industry bodies have been vocal in calling for its amendment. Whilst supporting settlement discipline overall, the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) in particular has warned of the negative consequences of the mandatory buy-in element of the CSDR on the functioning of the debt capital markets.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Basel III / FRTB: One Framework, Multiple Timelines, Mounting Pain for Global Firms

For much of the past decade, Basel III has been discussed as a global regulatory reform programme moving at uneven speed, but broadly in the same direction. The UK Prudential Regulation Authority’s confirmation of its Basel 3.1 timetable brings welcome clarity for firms operating in the UK market, yet it also underlines a deeper reality:...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

The Reference Data Utility Handbook

The potential of a reference data utility model has been discussed for many years, and while early implementations failed to gain traction, the model has now come of age as financial institutions look for new data management models that can solve the challenges of operational cost reduction, improved data quality and regulatory compliance. The multi-tenanted...