About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ESMA Provides FAQ on Common Definitions for European Money Market Funds Under UCITS

Subscribe to our newsletter

As part of the revised Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive in Europe, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a Q&A document that details its guidelines for regulators regarding common definitions for the supervision of money market funds. The paper is aimed at getting European regulators in synch with regards to the treatment of these instruments across the region and to this end, includes information about the expected treatment of ratings (internal and external), details of semantics related to these funds and ESMA’s expectations for firms’ treatment of these instruments.

As stated by ESMA in the document: “The Q&A mechanism is a practical convergence tool used to promote common supervisory approaches and practices under Article 29(2) of the ESMA Regulation.” As such, it is a living document and any further questions or requests for clarification can be added by emailing moneymarketfunds@esma.europa.eu.

The Q&A currently highlights items such as ESMA’s expectations in terms of a management company’s internal rating process; the treatment of instruments with only long term ratings and those that have not been rated; and the definition of what constitutes a “recognised credit rating agency,” among other things. It also provides technical details with regards to the calculation of various aspects of money market funds’ structures, such as the weighted average maturity of the fund or its weighted average life.

ESMA has spent a large part of this year delving into the data related details of various pieces of legislation and, with regards to UCITS, it is an extension of the work carried out by its predecessor last year. The European level regulator has also spent a considerable amount of time, along with the rest of the global regulatory community, consulting on the subject of credit ratings agency as part of the crackdown on the sector.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practices for regulatory reporting

Regulatory reporting is a repetitive, time consuming and expensive business. At its best it requires robust data governance, automated data collection and reporting, standardised reporting formats, a centralised reporting system and a means to monitor and review regulatory change. Nothing new here – but there are emerging approaches and technologies that could lighten the load....

BLOG

Swap Data Was Supposed to Deliver Transparency. A Decade Later, Regulators Are Still Trying to Use It

For more than a decade, regulators have collected vast quantities of derivatives transaction data through swap data repositories (SDRs) mandated by post-crisis financial reforms. Yet despite the scale of these datasets, transforming reported trade data into meaningful supervisory insight has often proved more difficult than policymakers anticipated. A new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...